Running With Quills, Blogsite for Jayne Ann Krentz, Elizabeth Lowell, Stella Cameron, and Suzanne Simmons
Susan Andersen
Suzanne Simmons



Stella Cameron
Stella Cameron




Lori Foster
Suzanne Simmons



Jayne Ann Krentz
Jayne Ann Krentz




Elizabeth Lowell
Elizabeth Lowell




Suzanne Simmons
Suzanne Simmons











  • Welcome to Running With Quills, your online newsletter designed to keep you up to date with what your favorite authors (that would be us) are doing throughout the year. Here you will find the release dates of our new books and get information about our backlists. We'll preview our cover art here long before the books hit the stores and we'll keep you informed about works-in-progress and special projects. You'll also receive advance notice of signings and appearances. From time to time we'll give you a peek at our worlds, tell you what we're reading, and introduce you to some new authors.

    Thursday, January 26, 2006

    Love and/or War? Stella is curious.

    "Put milk in my tea, please."

    "I'll take the dressing on the side."

    "Hold the vermouth, I like my vodka naked."

    Are we three groups of readers, do you think, the mixers, the dabblers, the purists? How many other classifications of readers might be added to the list?

    I'm a mixer. Toss almost any element at me and as long as the story holds my interest I'll keep on reading. Characters I love to love and love to hate, characters that make me smile, or cry, these are the glue that holds a story together for me. Add a darn good yarn: thriller, whodunit, procedural, soft sci-fi, literary story, fantasy, historical romance, contemporary romance, romantic suspense (list goes on,)make sure there's a relationship I must root for--and some sweet, sensual, dangerous or outrageous sex and I'm hooked. We mixers are either adventurous in our tastes, or our taste buds are tickled by any piquant possibility. Some might even say we have no taste!

    The dabbler has favorite genres and can have a good time with an occasional "alien" book. This reader also enjoys a story encompassing more than one element but probably leans heavily toward one and uses any others as seasoning or dipping sauce.

    Purists want their drug-of-choice straight, neat, unadulterated. This doesn't mean the reader is narrow in his tastes, but she is highly educated in a particular form of fiction. The purist reader may have more than one favorite genre but he likes each one served on a separate plate.

    Which group do you belong to? Or are you entrenched in a more exotic reading addiction? Why--or what is it about your favorite stories that resonates for you?

    Cheers, Stella






    38 Comments:

    Blogger DFender said...

    I'd say that I lean more into the Mixer realm myself. I'll read anything that I can get into. Great characters are a big must for me or I feel like I didn't accomplish much by the time I finish the book. Any genre, fiction, non-fiction, mystery, romance, historical, etc. Anything goes. As long as the story is well-written and the characters grab me... I'm there! I have a list of favorite authors who manage to accomplish all of that without fail. Thank God!

    The stories that I continue to re-read have the best characters. They make me laugh out loud, sniffle into a Kleenex, grind my teeth and stomp my feet.

    3:32 AM  
    Blogger Cbell said...

    I believe I am a mixer as well. Character development is CRITICAL. If I can't wrap my mind (and a smidgen of my heart) around the main characters, I only skim through the book and pray to get to the end.

    How do I know when I've become attached? I find that I begin to scowl when the main character is scowling, or I begin to laugh... it can be somewhat embarrassing on a plane!

    5:05 AM  
    Blogger Milady Insanity said...

    Mixer.

    I'll read absolutely any book that holds my attention long enough.

    I agree with Cbell, character development is critical. It shouldn't be all plot, after all.

    6:10 AM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    Interesting question . . . I would say I'm a dabbler and leaning towards a mixer. I do have favorite genres to read. I soooo enjoy romance and mystery, but I will read just about anything if I feel it's well written. I'm pretty lucky, as an academic librarian (who has tolerant cataloging buddies)I get to see books on a daily basis while picking and choosing what holds my interest.

    6:58 AM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    A mixer. I have many interests in several genres that are well written. Characters are critical and I love reading a new author (think Marjorie Liu, Elizabeth Vaughan) as well as my favs. I also miss some who have retired and no longer write (Maggie Osborne, LaVeryl Spencer) and am constantly looking for writers like them. Of course, the favs (Krentz, Lowell, Phillips, etc) are always on my shelves. A new guy on my list is Simon Green. Men, too fill my shelves.

    7:36 AM  
    Blogger Suzanne Simmons said...

    I'm a mixer like you, Stella. So much more interesting and fun that way. On my TBR pile right now is a Cornelia Funke YA, a Christine Feehan, a Nelson DeMille, Pride and Prejudice (of course), 1776 (recommended by my husband who found it very eye-opening), and a bunch of research books. I can't wait to have a fiction read-fest later this spring when I have a couple of weeks off!

    7:46 AM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    Mostly I'll try any book. Sometimes a bad cover or slow opening stops me from buying unless the author is an auto-buy like Simmons, Hamilton, Krentz,
    Cameron,Patterson Sparks and more.
    Good writing and good characters and lots of story and action=good book

    8:51 AM  
    Blogger Deb R said...

    Mixer here, all the way. I'll try any genre, or even books so off-beat they don't fit into a genre, as long as the characters are believable and the story is insteresting.

    10:50 AM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    Mixer here as well. As long as the writing is good and the characters interesting, I'm there for the duration of the book. Most of my favorite authors blend genres anyway; I think those distinctions, artificial to begin with, are becoming increasingly meaningless. It's getting annoying to go into a bookstore or library and having to check fiction, romance, science fiction, and mystery for all my favorite authors - because in each store or branch they're in a different section!

    Anon. #1 - if you like Simon R. Green, try Jim Butcher.

    12:15 PM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    Anon. #2 - I do read Jim Butcher, thanks. Both were recommended by Charlaine Harris (Sookie Stackhouse series and new 'Grave Sight'). Also, mysteries/thrillers by Crais, Coben, Sandford, etc are all very good writers. And they write stand-a-lones as well as series.

    12:37 PM  
    Blogger Stella said...

    Just read through the comments and love all the suggestions for authors and titles. Perhaps we should keep a list of these on the site and add anything that comes in new.

    12:51 PM  
    Blogger cate said...

    I'm a dabbler. When family and friends recommend a title, I'll always try it! But I don't have a problem shutting a book if it's not to my liking. I agree it has to start with someone that I can cheer for.

    1:20 PM  
    Blogger talpianna said...

    Who am I to disagree with all this wisdom? Mixer here! I will add that I really like a story which has some sort of moral balance, in which good triumphs over evil in some way. One of the reasons I prefer romantic suspense to romance is that it has villains to be, as C.S. Lewis put it, "soundly killed at the end"--or at least locked up where the sun don't shine.

    My book rec: the Monkeewrench series (MONKEEWRENCH, LIVE BAIT, DEAD RUN) by P.J. Tracy--wonderful mystery-suspense with more than a touch of romance, and wonderful characters.

    1:36 PM  
    Blogger Brandy said...

    Hmmmm, dabbler with a side of purist. I like romance, mysteries, science fiction and some history tomes. However if my mysteries or science fiction have romance or romances have mysteries or a bit of the 'sci-fi' I don't mind. I however don't require them to have the others characteristics.(jeez, mixed up or what?)

    3:49 PM  
    Blogger Gram said...

    Thanks bloggers for all the suggestions. I like many genres, but I am old enough to have my 50 page rule. If it isn't interesting in the first 50 pages that's it. I have so many books on my TBR list that I can't waste any more than 50-if that, pages. I do not have that much reading time left.
    As the saying goes: So many books, so little time.

    3:55 PM  
    Blogger KathyK said...

    I reckon I'd be more a purist than a mixer. I love reading romance and romantic suspense but the Rules Must Be Followed. It has to have a happy ending and good should triumph over evil. I agree with Tal on that. Most of what I read is romance or subgenres but if there is a strong plot and interesting character development I'll read anything. I read very fast, so my rule is about 3 chapters. I hate not to finish what I start, but if it doesn't grab me in 3 chapters, I probably won't finish it. I like Sci-Fi, fantasy, history, biography, techno-thrillers, mysteries and police procedurals. I do not like anything creepy or horror-focused though I don't mind a hint of the supernatural. I'm thinking of Nora Roberts' "Key" series. I like to understand the mind of the characters and feel I have gotten to know them at the end. Since I am a nurse, very little in the way of gore upsets me but there has to be a reason for gore other than sick voyeurism. I like heroic characters but I identify more with characters who are flawed and working through to healing.

    5:57 PM  
    Anonymous Louis said...

    I like to mix them up. Contemptary Romance, Romantic Suspence, Historical, even a Western. I'll often take a Zane Grey or W. M. Raine for re-reading. Ever since a teen-ager I have read the ending chapter and if liked will read the rest of the book.
    Louis

    6:31 PM  
    Blogger DFender said...

    My current TBR List includes...

    Michael Collins by Tim Pat Coogan
    On The Run by Iris Johansen
    Jarhead by Anthony Swafford
    Anyone but You by Jennifer Crusie
    The Princes of Ireland by Edward Rutherford
    The N - S Books in the Alphabet Mysteries by Sue Grafton
    Wild Irish by Robin Maxwell

    ...incidentally I just finished (tonight) All Night Long by our resident JAK and it was STUPENDOUS! "Don't let the rain hit the muffins." Ha! That killed me...er in the best possible way... lol

    8:09 PM  
    Blogger Stella said...

    Meant to mention that cbell's revelation about laughing or frowning with characters rings a positive note with me. I know I laugh aloud sometimes and, as you say, this can be awkward on a plane. If I feel someone looking at me, I just give them an aren't-we-having-fun grin.

    10:53 PM  
    Blogger Jay said...

    I think I might be a Mixer. *g* I will read absolutely anything - any genre, any mix thereof, and I love the pure genres as much as the mixed ones. Basically, it just has to interest me - it has to have intelligent characters, a good plot, a reasonable pace and be comprehensible.

    My collections range from John Sandford and Andrew Vachss, to Robin McKinley and Anne McCaffrey, to Kelley Armstrong and Charlaine Harris, to Amanda Quick and Georgette Heyer, to Elizabeth Lowell, JAK, Linda Howard and Iris Johansen.

    I also have non-fiction books on true crime, forensics, mythologies, gemstones, psychics, Native Americans and druidic history.

    The list goes on. And on.

    11:43 PM  
    Blogger MathCogIdiocy said...

    If there is such a thing as a purist-mixer, that's me. As far as fiction goes, Jay's statement-"it just has to interest me - it has to have intelligent characters, a good plot, a reasonable pace and be comprehensible" pretty well covers me. But my fiction reading time is limited so I tend to stay within a fairly confined set of authors/genres that I know I can count on.

    I have to admit that my first response to mixer was to think that the worst book I could imagine would mix something like a study of Riemann's zeta function with a love story. Yucky. *grin*

    7:26 AM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    Reading All Night Long at the moment. You rock, JAK!

    Sometimes I stop a book mid-chapter if it's skiving me out.

    For example, I was reading a book (don't remember the author or title) and I know if I just could get through the villian torturing and killing a dog, I could finish the book. Could not do it. No way. It was hinted that a person would die the same way and I stopped. Does this make me a wimp?

    Lila

    8:07 AM  
    Anonymous Jan said...

    I'm a mixer in what I love to read and write, which is probably not great writing wise since branding in a specific genre is so essential. :) What draws me into a story is connecting with the characters--if I laugh out loud or cry along with them, the writer has done their job well imo.

    9:24 AM  
    Blogger talpianna said...

    Here you are, Jacqui:

    I am never forget the day my first book is published.
    Every chapter I stole from somewhere else.
    Index I copy from old Vladivostok telephone directory.
    This book, this book was sensational!
    Pravda - ah, Pravda - Pravda said:

    "Zhil byl korol' kogda-to, Pri njom blokha zhila" ("It stinks").
    But Izvestia! Izvestia said:
    "Ya idu kuda sam tzar' peshkom hodil" ("It stinks").
    Metro-Goldwyn-Moskva bought the movie rights for six million rubles,
    Changing title to 'The Eternal Triangle',
    With Brigitte Bardot playing part of hypotenuse.


    And who deserves the credit?
    And who deserves the blame?
    Nicolai Ivanovich Lobachevsky is his name.
    Oy!

    2:10 PM  
    Blogger MathCogIdiocy said...

    Tal - you rock! ROFLMAO

    3:15 PM  
    Blogger Stella said...

    Ah, Tal...LOL. And I laughed at Reimann's zeta function with a love story, Math--even if I did have to check on Reimann's function first. I don't have to understand the function to see the humor in your suggestion.

    3:41 PM  
    Blogger Irishpixie said...

    I'm going to say I'm a dabbler. I have my definite tastes, likes, and dislikes. I have my favorite authors whom I buy no matter what cuz I know they'll deliver what I want. This doesn't mean that I stick with one genre. I love sci-fi (high fantasy), romantic suspense, romance, mystery, and some horror. But the story has to give me what I'm looking for.

    The only problem right now is that I'm in Korea and am very limited in my choices of books. B&N ships here but it takes bloody forever to get them. Luckily there are several ladies out there who have adopted me and keep me supplied.

    4:49 PM  
    Blogger talpianna said...

    I should have pointed out, for those of you too young to remember his heyday, that the song is "Lobachevsky" by Tom Lehrer.

    3:49 PM  
    Blogger Joyce said...

    Definitely a mixer. Just finished JAK's All Night Long (fantastic), J. McNaught's Every Breath You Take, and Iris Johansen's On the Run. Next up J.D. ROBB's Memory in
    Death. Now how am I going to go back to normal reading after that group?

    4:03 PM  
    Anonymous Ranurgis said...

    I'm definitely a mixer too. I read non-fiction from archaeology to history to political science and theology. The same goes for fiction: children's books to romance, suspense, sci-fi, historical novels as opposed to historical romances (I read both but truly prefer the former--my first love), some mystery and paranormal but I draw the line at too much gore and that includes vampires and the like.

    Anonymous, what you wrote about that particular book that you didn't like reminds me of one of the grossest movies I have ever seen--hailed by many as a masterpiece. It was Jean-Luc Godard's "Week End" made in 1967. In it, a rabbit is slaughtered; first of all, it made me remember how the Frenchwoman in whose family I was "au pair" 1962-63 carried home a skinned rabbit by the feet in all its gory glory--and the children (five of the seven) fought over who would get to eat the brain. That was enough already to turn my stomach. The film then went on to show a scene which to me resembled cannibalism. I can never remember that film without utter disgust. The trip with madame had never bothered me as much as it did after I saw the film. Now the two are indelibly linked in my brain with cannibalism. That's why I really don't like vampires, other graphic killings. I've come to accept that I am a wimp. I can't even watch an operation on medical TV. Yeah, give me happy or neutral endings. I do read some murder stories which are "shudder-worth" but usually they're quite short scene and the story goes on to having the murder solved.

    8:36 PM  
    Anonymous Stella said...

    ranurgis--nice start to my day! I will not read anything in which animals suffer. Gratuitous animal torture such as you describe in Week End (a "masterpiece" I fortunately missed) is horrendous. Like you, and like anonymous, even a hint of such things sends the book into the garbage.

    4:39 AM  
    Blogger DFender said...

    I just finished A Grave Mistake and Ms. Stella, you are quite the wonder! As with all the others in the Bayou bunch (French Quarter Cold Day in July, Kiss Them Goodbye & Now You See Him) this book makes me think I wanna live in Toussaint too! Waaaaaa! Holy cow! Homer & Char ... Nope, no spoilers here ;)

    6:31 PM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    Have to say,I'm with you on animal deaths - books, movies, whatever, if an animal suffers, I leave it. I never forgave John Wayne movies for killing off the dog at the end of Big Jake - and even now, many years later, I refuse to watch any of his films.

    It doesn't bother me much when people get killed or whatever - although I also draw the line at kids, unless the mayhem happens offstage.

    7:20 PM  
    Anonymous Stella said...

    dfender: Very glad you had so much fun with A GRAVE MISTAKE. I admit I'm pretty attached to those Toussaint folks myself. Thank you for letting me know.

    8:51 PM  
    Blogger talpianna said...

    Looking at the title of this entry, it occurs to me that there was a movie about you back in the sixties, I think--I AM CURIOUS STELLA....

    2:24 PM  
    Blogger Stella said...

    Not as curious as I am, Tal! I didn't know there was ever a movie about me:)

    10:17 PM  
    Blogger FAO said...

    I definitely am a mixer.  I love reading books that allow me to visualize the action as it happens.  If the pace is too slow, or the actions of the characters are unbelieveable, then I won't read the book.

    Francesca A. Ortiz

    11:21 PM  
    Blogger Kaye Dacus said...

    I've never looked at it that way! What an interesting concept. As a reader as well as an author, I guess I'm a dabbler. I have my favorite genre to read/write (Inspirational romance) but will read outside the genre occasionally when it's something that strikes my fancy (SciFi/Fantasy, action, historical, etc.)

    Kaye Dacus
    http://kndacus.blogspot.com
    http://nashacfw.blogspot.com

    7:17 PM  

    Post a Comment

    << Home

    Powered by Blogger