Running With Quills, Blogsite for Jayne Ann Krentz, Elizabeth Lowell, Stella Cameron, and Suzanne Simmons
Susan Andersen
Suzanne Simmons



Stella Cameron
Stella Cameron




Lori Foster
Suzanne Simmons



Jayne Ann Krentz
Jayne Ann Krentz




Elizabeth Lowell
Elizabeth Lowell




Suzanne Simmons
Suzanne Simmons






Welcome to Running With Quills, your online newsletter designed to keep you up to date with what your favorite authors (that would be us) are doing throughout the year. Here you will find the release dates of our new books and get information about our backlists. We'll preview our cover art here long before the books hit the stores and we'll keep you informed about works-in-progress and special projects. You'll also receive advance notice of signings and appearances. From time to time we'll give you a peek at our worlds, tell you what we're reading, and introduce you to some new authors.

Sunday, October 15, 2006

Starting Over--again

Photo by Scotiabank Toronto Waterfront Marathon Staff 09-24-06
"How many books have you written?" For me, that question is right up there with, "Where do you get your ideas?" My mind blanks and I waffle. In fact, I don't know the exact number of publications and I never stop to make a count.

Many authors have written a large number of books but therein lies a danger: people don't expect a writer to respond with a high number and if they do, the listener is often making the judgment that the books must have been "churned out" factory-style. That's embarrassing, especially if you're not into justifying yourself.

The assumption is often that if you are really multi-published, you obviously don't take enough time over your work. There isn't an author on this blog who doesn't pour herself into her stories. This isn't a hobby, or a pastime we come back to when we've got a couple of down hours. Every day is a work day for me and that's the way I want it.

Sometimes the relationship between the story and me is a battle, one that I never give up on.

Where did all this come from? This evening as I decided what I wanted to blog about, I was also immersed in starting my next book. The April, Pointe Judah Bayou Book (#2 in the series) is in and already heading for ARCs (advance reader copies for the industry). I finished revising the story in Kauai--for a little over a week. No, I didn't whine about using up my vacation that way--much--because that's part of the agreement I make with my publisher: I will finish what I've promised to finish, as best I can and as close to deadline as I can.


But I'm off-topic and have been since I started this:) Starting Over--again, came to me because I'm writing the proposal for the next Pointe Judah Bayou Book. Next year there will be two books in this series, in April and in November. I am gradually pushing the April book out of my head--although it's not all gone yet. But the November book now bubbles up to the surface and I'm putting the proposal together.

The characters line up, then one or two take a holiday from the story while a few others slip into place. Then, of course, major characters who have never appeared before become absolutely necessary this time.

Conflicts? No trouble, no story so conflicts are paramount. At the moment they are scrambling over each other, each one insisting they are the most important. And I battle a desire to go to bed and pull the covers over my head. Only that wouldn't stop the ruckus. It's important for me to get the outline down as fast as possible, knowing there will be much tweaking to follow.

Another struggle goes on between characters, each of whom think they are the most important. And, I admit, each one does seem incredible important when they first confront me.

A saving grace arrives in the form of a series of definite climaxes in the book's action. So that's what I'm up to. Sifting through characters, some very familiar, some utterly strange to me. Delia Board appeared in TARGET and I've decided she'll be back in the next book. We'll visit Poke Around, an "interesting" gift shop at the Oakdale Mansion Center in Point Judah, and Ona's Out Front--and, naturally Ona's Out Back. I think a new establishment is opening where swamp pop, zydeco some reggae and assorted jazz will be the draw, in addition to great food and "make sure your stomach isn't empty before you drink these," drinks. I see some intriguing acts and some connections that are just a bit "out there." After all, this is voodoo country and that parched gray shack deep in the swamps, the one owned by Cruzah, a much feared practitioner who is known to be capricious, looms central to the plot. He may chose good or evil. He alone weighs the merits (according to
his own standards) of a request for either cure, or illness, or even death, and the outcome is only known after the spell is cast.

My characters will walk close to the boundaries of evil when they decide to confront Cruzah. And so a new story is born. Not cranked out, although that would be so much more simple:) Events I haven't even dreamed of will burst on scene and some points I think are so important right now will diminish and even go away. But it's my job, right now, to write a proposal that makes my editors excited, makes them itch for the chapters. Yes, I'm starting all over--again. And I must be slightly unhinged because I'm never more excited than I am as I start slipping the pieces together--unless it's when the actual story throws me some curves.

Photo by Adrienne Stewart 09-24-06
What makes you laugh, or cry, about a story?

What makes you mad when you're reading?

Always read--that way lie ultimate brain treats,

Stella

24 Comments:

Anonymous Ranurgis said...

I think if books could be churned out, I'd certainly have written one long ago. In fact, when I was in my teens and dreaming of the dream job that I was going to be doing some time in the future, I imagined myself in NYC at the U.N. and plotted a bit of story about that. But my imagination is zero. And I can't even imagine what it must be like to create a book from a small kernel of an idea.

I know it can't be easy, so my hat is off to all of you who "seem" to do it with never a qualm.

But that is one of the things that the blogs have taught me: there's a lot more to putting a story in print than just having an idea. Just from commenting on some things, I realize that any writing takes a lot of care. I can write essays about certain subjects but I know one of these comments, unless they just contain pure fact, many e-mails that I want to write should just sit for a while and then get redone, sit a while more and then, if I'm satisfied be posted.

This is one reason I haven't started a blog myself. I'm far better at reacting to something than acting; e.g., starting a conversation.

I can't even tell you what exactly makes me laugh or cry. Of course there is that understated humour that I like where just a word used a certain way will make me smile as do the old 40's movies. Poignant moments are likely to make me cry or the death of a character who has become a friend. Or when a character has been longing for a long time to meet his real family only to find that the last one has just died or that they really don't want anything to do with him. Ditto for divorces.

The things that will make me mad are impossibilities in the plot. I can remember one in which a group of people rode by horse all over Russia during the winter and then rode straight into battle when they heard cannons about 40 miles from where they were. This was in an early book of the new era of historical romances. I guess thorough research wasn't high on the list of things to do for a book.

Or a man who was blood brother to seemingly every tribe in the known world at the age of about 25 when it took months and years to reach said tribes. I'm deliberately focusing on older books but some newer ones are equally improbable especially in historical novels or books that involve distances. Those are almost always underestimated.

See, you can get me writing but does it make sense? I'd love to let it percolate for a while but the blog doesn't allow it and my fingers are tired.

Thanks, Stella, for sharing with us what it means to you to get another story ready for the world. These are fascinating glimpses that make us readers who don't write realize what struggles you have to go through to bring a book to life and bring life to a book.

10:13 PM  
Blogger DFender said...

Stella,

Great conversational dialogue between characters makes me laugh. Sad circumstances, if I've been drawn in by the characters, makes me cry. Your stories and characters, Stella, seem to bring out all emotions, every time. Thank YOU!

Horrible writing - poor character development, boring dialogue, etc. makes me mad when I read. If I'm investing time into reading well it'd better be worth my time... geez, sounds kinda mean, huh? True, though.

ranurgis wrote: "Thanks, Stella, for sharing with us what it means to you to get another story ready for the world. These are fascinating glimpses that make us readers who don't write realize what struggles you have to go through to bring a book to life and bring life to a book." I couldn't agree MORE!

Happy Monday!
Deb

PS. To Jayne, if still in Hawaii, I hope that you and yours're well after the earthquake. I was thinkin' about allayou authors that love Hawaii when I heard the news.

3:38 AM  
Blogger Lori Foster said...

Hey Stella,
I just love the blogs that give us insight to how authors write. It seems the process is in some ways unique for each, and in other ways just the same.

For me, I get angry in a book if a character puts up with too much abuse without valid reasons, and if any heroic character (main female or male protagonist) fails to put a child, any child, first. Can't help it. It's just part of who I am I guess. For me, failure to put kids first takes the heroism out of the character.

I prefer for the chuckles in a book to come from dialogue, and I get sad when it seems that a character I love doesn't get the emotional support he or she deserves. Then, as the plot develops and the characters do get what they should, it's wonderful!

HUGS,

Lori

5:39 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i hate typos, i hate when the story is predictable, and i hate having someone talk and the author uses the wrong characters name

9:19 AM  
Anonymous AgTigress said...

One of the things that makes me throw a book against the wall is a heroine who is still in her mid-20s, but is already a high-profile and successful member of a profession, such as medicine, architecture or law, that requires years of study and practical experience before a person even qualifies, let alone becomes a respected practitioner!

The fact that authors who write such heroines then usually have them behave, in emotional matters, as though they are particularly dim 13-year-olds puts the tin lid on it.

9:57 AM  
Blogger Karibear said...

I'm not sure just what does make me laugh or cry over books. Humor, the more twisted the better, double/ triple/ quadruple entendres, [a plain double has to be really good]. I tend to find humor in stories where it probably wasn't intended, at least to the extent I felt - as in Laurell K Hamilton's books set in St Louis - but that's just me.

I don't like settings where the writer has obviously never been and knows zip about the place[s] described. It's worse in historicals, but it can be just as bad in modern stories, too. No way is anyone going to get anywhere in Seattle FAST, no matter whether they drove a carriage or drive a car. It seems like it should be a very basic thing, to look at a map and check distances, then see how long it takes to walk a mile or so and extrapolate.

There has to be enough accuracy and internal consistency in detail to allow the story to provide a 'willing suspension of disbelief' as one of my teachers once said.

What irks me the most - and will put me off reading another book by the author - are really glaring errors. A few typos are one thing and everyone finds them sooner or later, but switching character gender and/or names in midstream is a big no-no. I figure if the story had so little importance to the writer/proofreader that they couldn't be bothered, then I can't be bothered to read it, either.

10:14 AM  
Blogger Jayne Ann Krentz said...

Wow, Stella! I'm getting chills from Cruzah already! Can't wait.

--Jayne

PS, Defender: No, sadly, Frank and I didn't get stranded in Hawaii by the earthquake. We were back in Seattle when it hit. Darn. Can't imagine any place I'd rather get stuck...

10:44 AM  
Anonymous AgTigress said...

Karibear, you are so right about the 'look at a MAP' thing!

I don't know if I have mentioned it here, but people who know me will know what I am going to say: many years ago I started an historical romance by a well-known American author (and I genuinely can't remember who it was!) which was set in the early 19th century.

It had the heroine dancing the night away at a London ball till the small hours of the morning, and then travelling to Liverpool to board a vessel bound for America later the SAME MORNING!

I know Great Britain is small by American standards, but that doesn't mean that you can get from any point in it to another in an hour or two, even today! I don't know what happened later in the story; I tossed the book. Maybe the heroine casually made her way from New York across the uncharted wilderness to the West Coast in three days...

Typos are not really a problem: only Allah is perfect, and allowances must be made. I am very keenly aware, too, as a writer myself, that mistakes can mysteriously bloom and blossom in a manuscript after it has been checked and proof-read at least twice by four editors, three colleagues, two friends, one author and a partridge in a pear tree. So I always reserve judgement on those kinds of mistakes. They really are different from the fundamental research errors, like not thinking how long a journey of x miles took by road, in a horse-drawn vehicle.

:-)

12:10 PM  
Blogger Estella said...

I don't like to read a book where the author forgets the color of the eyes or hair of her characters.

1:09 PM  
Blogger Stella said...

Ranurgis:

I understand the desire to check one's words again and again. Each time I mail a finiched manuscript to New York I'm convinced I should, somehow, get it back!

Stella

1:45 PM  
Blogger Stella said...

Hi Deb:

Depth of character is of ultimate importance to me. If I can't care about them, I'll put the book down.

Stella

1:47 PM  
Blogger Stella said...

Thanks, Jayne: Cruzah is a piece of work!

Cheers, Stella

1:48 PM  
Blogger Stella said...

Hi, Lori:

The victim character gets to me every time. And there's a difference between defenseless and spineless.

Cheers, Stella

1:50 PM  
Anonymous Ranurgis said...

About mistakes in spelling or what may be called typos: I talked to one of the writers who was at the RT Conference in Toronto in 1999 and mentioned something about a mistake I'd seen. She said, "Oh, yeah, I remember that one. I had it correct on my original manuscript and when I got it back for editing, it had this mistake in it. I corrected it. I got it back with the mistake and sent it back corrected. Well, in their infinite wisdom somebody really didn't believe me and the book went into print with a mistake because somebody or several people were sure that they knew better." It just shows how something that was right to begin with, can be "queered" by the publishing house. Since then I've been less likely to blame the author on difficult words or foreign languages.

5:58 PM  
Blogger Ladytink_534 said...

A character with a good sense of humor is what can always make me laugh in a book but you will seldom ever catch me crying unless I can somehow sympathize or empathize with what's going on. There are quite a few things that makes me mad though. Books that seem condescending is my biggest pet peeve though and see-through plots is another one.

7:12 PM  
Blogger Stella said...

So much hangs on the writer's willingless to research.

On the topic of travel in England in the early 19th Centure: one has only to figure out how far a horse can travel and at what speed, given specific conditions to come up with an acceptable answer. Sometimes I've felt "brain-knotted" by the time I've finished with this type of calculation.

Stella

7:13 PM  
Anonymous AgTigress said...

Ranurgis's comment highlights the problem of 'incorrecting' or 'miscorrecting', when editors actually think the author has made a mistake when she hasn't. Why doesn't the editor ask the author, one wonders? There are examples in, for example, dialogue in Regency historicals, where an author will correctly use 'got' as the past participle of 'get', and an editor will bossily change it to the American 'gotten', which has not been said by a British English speaker for at least 400 years.

But there is an even odder thing than that. In the days of letterpress, it was easy to understand why making any change to a text could introduce mistakes where there had been none before, because the typesetter would have to break down and re-set whole lines. But how does it happen with electronic files? How does a photograph, integrated into the text, that was the right way round and up when the author saw the final page-proofs, turn itself back-to-front or even upside-down before the final printing? Someone must DO that, deliberately.

:-)

2:56 AM  
Anonymous dee said...

heroes/heroines that fall under the title of too stupid to live, or when some of the love scenes don't quite suit the chapter they are in, some anthologies seem only half a story when you get to the end and you go well, where's the rest? okay that's my bit

3:50 AM  
Blogger Lori Foster said...

Ranurgis, as an author, I can tell you that the typos are rarely our fault! LOL. Seriously.

I remember once I had a few lines of Spanish in my book. I had gotten the correct words/spelling/usage directly from a man who speaks Spanish as his first language, and a copy editor (probably with high school Spanish) changed it for me. :::sigh::: I changed it back, and spoke with the editor to ensure it'd stay changed.

Lori

4:55 AM  
Anonymous AgTigress said...

Lori - this is what I don't understand about an editor: why did she change the Spanish (simply assuming that you were mistaken), rather than query it - 'are you sure the Spanish is correct?'

Queries are one thing - and we all make mistakes, alas, and hope that editors will pick them up and save us from ourselves. But simply assuming that, where there seems to be doubt, the author is bound to be wrong, seems bizarre to me.

7:07 AM  
Blogger Stella said...

You are all doing a good thing today--you're making me smile.

Tigress: An editor once argued that I was wrong in writing about a scent remembered by a character. She said, "people don't remember scents." Oh, really? Why does a freshly unwrapped block of Cadbury's Fruit and Nut come instantly to mind?

Lori: Since most of my books are set in Cajun country, I do use some of their terms. I own two large volumes on the language and usage, and I check with folks who live there. But I think you can imagine some of the queries I've had.

Dee: I'm with you. Stupid doesn't do it. And it's possible that the structure of a novella, which should,of course, have a beginning a middle and an end, throws some writers who are only accustomed to novel length work.

ladytink and karibear: I also like to laugh. And I enjoy those sly, perhaps black bits, too. If I have to go to the dictionary to check the meaning of a word, things are not going well at all:)

Estella: Again, this is a place where an author taken up with the story could make a mistake with a color, but copyediting should catch that.

Cheers, Stella

12:33 PM  
Anonymous AgTigress said...

"An editor once argued that I was wrong in writing about a scent remembered by a character."

***

I think I'd just have said, 'speak for yourself, Sunshine'.

:-)

3:23 PM  
Anonymous Lou said...

Stella - who WAS that editor? Scientists have done studies on scents and have found that scents are very much attached to memories and the accompanying feelings. For instance, I can walk outside my house at night, smell smoke from fireplaces from the surrounding houses and be immediately transported in my mind to the camp in the mountains I used to attend as a child (they had bonfires at night), or to my favorite ski resort where I stayed in a friend's cabin. It's just like being there all over again.

Scents also can bring back negative as well as positive memories. They are entwined in our viseral experiences.

I think that editor needs to read more - {{g}}

3:48 PM  
Blogger Stella said...

Tigress, You bet I'll use that next time:)

Lou, Pitch on pine trees. Earth. We could go on and on:)

Stella

8:40 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger