Running With Quills, Blogsite for Jayne Ann Krentz, Elizabeth Lowell, Stella Cameron, and Suzanne Simmons
Susan Andersen
Suzanne Simmons



Stella Cameron
Stella Cameron




Lori Foster
Suzanne Simmons



Jayne Ann Krentz
Jayne Ann Krentz




Elizabeth Lowell
Elizabeth Lowell




Suzanne Simmons
Suzanne Simmons











  • Welcome to Running With Quills, your online newsletter designed to keep you up to date with what your favorite authors (that would be us) are doing throughout the year. Here you will find the release dates of our new books and get information about our backlists. We'll preview our cover art here long before the books hit the stores and we'll keep you informed about works-in-progress and special projects. You'll also receive advance notice of signings and appearances. From time to time we'll give you a peek at our worlds, tell you what we're reading, and introduce you to some new authors.

    Sunday, November 19, 2006

    Jayne Draws the Line


    Now that the vampire craze has gone from being "the next new thing" to becoming a major, well established subgenre -- as I predicted a few years ago, by the bye -- I am frequently asked "when are you going to do a vampire novel?" The answer is "probably never". (In this business I never say never).

    Trust me, I looked at the idea six ways from Sunday back at the start of the rush. I really wanted to write a vampire novel, not only because vampires are the ultimate Alpha Males but also because being one of the first to catch a rising tide and ride the crest of a big new genre wave is an ideal situation for an author. But, alas, it was not meant to be.

    I could enjoy reading vampire novels but I couldn't figure out how to write one -- not without obliterating most of the standard conventions (the ethical and moral implications of eternal life for creatures who clearly haven't done anything to deserve it, risk of incineration by sunlight, the necessity of drinking real Bloody Marys to stay fit, etc., etc.). I figured I could handle the great sex and the cool clothes that go with the vampire lifestyle but the other stuff was just too complicated. I don't do magic. I need some grounding in reality, however faint.


    Ah, you say, but you do write paranormal fiction, Jayne. Yes, I do. I write psychic romantic-suspense and I do it in three different settings: historical, contemporary and futuristic. I absolutely love writing stories with a strong psychic twist and have done so off and on since the very beginning of my career. Now, with the start of my new Arcane Society series, I'm pulling out all the stops.

    But, you see, for me there is a clear, bright line between the psychic and the supernatural. It may be a line that exists only for me and only in my imagination, but it is there and I don't seem to be able to cross it as a writer, although I can as a reader. I love the psychic thing because I see it as taking the concept of human intuition one step beyond. Almost everyone believes in intuition. Pushing the envelope in that realm works just fine for me.

    But it appears that, for now at any rate, I am doomed to remain a reader -- not a writer -- of vampire novels. If nothing else, I find myself curious to see how other authors deal with the factors that stopped me cold.

    What about you? Which of the many aspects of the vast new paranormal sub-genre appeal to you? Which ones do you love and which do you avoid?

    48 Comments:

    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    Psychic is unlikely, but in the realm of possibility. Just because we can't currently explain something does not mean there isn't a natural, rational cause. Radio and television and microwave ovens would seem supernatural to our distant ancestors.

    8:48 PM  
    Anonymous Kim said...

    Jayne,

    I feel the same way about the supernatural. I love reading about psychics but have a hard time with the supernatural.

    Kim

    9:28 PM  
    Blogger Karibear said...

    It's all in one's POV. Read Lyall Watson's Supernature or The Romeo Error. As for me, I think the idea of angels dancing on the head of a pin is rather supernatural, but it's the kind of thing wars have been fought over. And think of witches - They've been around forever, both black and white, and so has shamanism and animism. Are they supernatural or paranormal?

    I haven't yet managed to get any of the Arcane Society books, but I imagine I will enjoy them as much as I enjoyed Laurell K Hamilton's books and Anne Rice's books. Others that I've enjoyed are more along the line of fantasy and sci/fi. The world of Valdemar has gods that take personal interest in their subjects, and then there are some of Lackey's other books, the ones that retell fairy tales and stories of Faerie itself. I wouldn't mind having an Elvensteed that could turn itself into a Lotus or Harley at will and drive itself!

    It's not so much the genre or sub-genre, it's the writer and the story. I do avoid the 'gore for gore's sake' kind of thing, though - but I avoid that in just about everything I read.

    11:08 PM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    I avoid all things vampire. Period. Also horror. Apart from that I´ll give most genres a try but generally I like contemporaries or historicals best.
    Sirry.

    11:45 PM  
    Anonymous Carrie from Wisconsin said...

    But it appears that, for now at any rate, I am doomed to remain a reader -- not a writer -- of vampire novels. If nothing else, I find myself curious to see how other authors deal with the factors that stopped me cold.

    What about you? Which of the many aspects of the vast new paranormal sub-genre appeal to you? Which ones do you love and which do you avoid?

    Jayne,

    I'm not sure how "into" the vamp scene that you delve. If you really want to try your hand at it, go to the source. What I mean by this is that all legends have a source. Dracula is a direct descendent of Vlad Dracul, two-time ruler of a past Romanian empire. He was dubbed Vlad Tepes (Vlas the Impaler) because he did just that to those who wronged him and/or his people. What he did wasn't unusual, just over-kill. If you read the actual accounts of those events, you find that the numbers do not jive, for two reasons. Each side would have a person go around and tally the dead. The stats are gruesome, but a necessary evil. The problem here is that the rival counter (belonging to the troupe killed by Vlad) represented many more dead than Vlad's counter did. Why? No one really knows for sure. I can't see why Vlad would want his count exaggerated. It would figure, by all accounts, that he would prefer a true count. However, if the counter belonging to the rival country wanted to stir up anger and make this leader appear evil, it stands to reason that he might want to inflate the numbers.

    How could you deal with a vampiric character? A vampire is just a serial killer at "heart", at least, true vampires are. The ones of today have been glorified beyond everything. Granted it might make for interesting reading from time to time, but it distorts a legend that I have been into for many years. I guess that's why I don't necessarily read too much vamp fiction these days. I did like the "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" series. The movie was campy, even Joss Wedon admits that, but the series took things a very different way. It was this dynamic I liked, the good vs. evil dynamic. With some charcters (i.e. Angel, the vamp with a soul and Oz the werewolf who hated being a werewolf so much so that he locked himself in a cage during the stage of the full moon), the lines were blurred. I could go on and on here. "Forever Knight", a series filmed in Canada starring Geriant Wynn Davies, is also another of my favorites. I should also state here that I loved the TV series, "Charmed". I happen to be an avid reader of Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels also.

    I guess there are a few questions you would have to ask yourself:
    1. Did you want your character to be of myth or legend? Vampire = myth ; Vlad Tepes = legend
    2. When, in time, would this character exist? (the time factor can make a facade easier to create or more difficult)
    3. Is your character male or female?
    4. What type of character did you want him (or her) to be...truly evil or legendary for his work for the Crown or her work as a Fed?
    5. Would this character kill without remorse or would he struggle with the idea so much that he begins to ignore his "need" altogether?

    There are more questions, but they depend upon how you answer questions 1-5. If you want to write about a real vamp, the questions become more intricate. As you seem to be reluctant here, I am going to concentrate on the following direction.

    If you want to spin a character that is so feared that he has a reputation of being a vampire, then you have to ask the following (I used a male character to simplify matters and prevent the need for he/she):
    1. Does he appear to have vampiric habits such as only out at night, no mirrors in his house, etc.?
    2. Are his finances questionable?
    3. Does he work? If so, what exactly does he do? Is he a private investigator or a cop? Are there unanswered questions revolving around him at his job?

    These are just a few to maybe get you started.

    "...the ethical and moral implications of eternal life for creatures who clearly haven't done anything to deserve it..."

    That's just the point, vampires were usually unsuspecting victims in the beginning. Vampires aren't usually choosy about their victims, they kill just to kill,. They do not have souls nor scruples. That's what generally makes them monsters. Eternal life isn't all it's cracked up to be either. It can be a lonely miserable existence. Again, stories of today have a tendency to glorify and romanticise the notion of vampirism and what it entails.

    If this type of vamp isn't really your style, there maybe a new version that is. I was watching a show a couple of weeks ago that talked about "psychic" vampires. Psychic vampires work on the plane that you do work with. There is nothing visually violent about them.

    Yes, there are people out there who claim to "psychic" vamps. With what I have read of your Amanda Quick novels and what I have read of your Jayne Krentz novels, you could carry this off well. In fact, you could create a "psychic" vamp that lasts through the ages. He could begin in a couple of AQ novels, depending upon when he attains this feat and how it is done, could span centuries, as many vamps do. Maybe he becomes this way as a result of an alchemical experiment gone bad. Maybe he becomes this way because of a botched science experiment. There are many ways and many ideas to take the vampire to new and interesting levels.

    I have had a vampiric character sitting in my head for years waiting to get out. The problem I had was how to tell the story. Is that something that seems to be troubling for you too? I find myself grappling with questions of do I start with a journal or do I just start with the character? When does this character first become the monster? I am also not quite sure if my character wants to undergo a transformation from innocent good person to evil monster to a remorseful shell of a creature? It doesn't help that I haven't had enough time to devote to him lately.

    By now you should be able to figure out that I avoid stories that glorify vampirism. Yes, I read Bram Stoker's book and no, it was not my favorite. The movie version stunk, but the book was okay. I do feel that the vampiric life should not be romanticised nor should it be over sexed. Just like for a serial killer, killing provides the sexual release. I do like the idea of a victim not wanting to become a monster, resisting the will to feed. I like the idea that a vamp's first kill destroys the soul, thus creating a monster.

    I guess I like to equate vampire transformation with Calibos's transformation to a monster in the movie "Clash of the Titans" from 1981. I guess it's really the idea of choice that seals the deal for me. Is there a choice involved? Is there an ultimate decision to make the first kill and become a monster or ignore it and retain what little shreds of humanity remain?

    These questions that I posed here are the ones that I have used to determine a possible direction for some of my own characters. Hopefully they help.

    On an interesting note, I remember the days when supernatural applied to comic books and paranormal stuff and vampires were resigned to fantasy or horror. Weird how times change, isn't it?

    Carrie

    12:15 AM  
    Blogger Lynn said...

    I must be one of the few, but I am glad you will "probably not" be writing vampire novels anytime soon. I would read them if you did (cause you wrote it), but it is not a genre that appeals to me. I don't mind the psychic or magic (hah- mind the psychic) elements in a book because there are depths of the mind we have yet to uncover.

    All in all it comes down to what author is writing in this new sub-genre. If it's someone I usually enjoy, I'll give it a try.

    5:50 AM  
    Blogger Jayne Ann Krentz said...

    Thanks for the great comments and insights. One of the things that I find so fascinating about the new romantic paranormal subgenre is that it is starting to influence other genres such as mystery and suspense in a big way.

    Which only goes to prove my long-standing theory that most of what is new and intriguing in genre fiction starts first in the romance genre....

    6:48 AM  
    Blogger Cbell said...

    You know, I didn't think I would enjoy your paranormal series, because that is a little out there for my way of thinking... and then I laughed, because apparently I had no problem with vampire novels and how much more OUT THERE can you get? So, I slapped my mouth shut, opened my mind to imagination and just enjoyed!

    My bigger drawback is typically the voice of the writer. I would much rather read in third person. I can enjoy books written in first person if they are on tape/CD. Is that too weird?

    7:34 AM  
    Blogger Suzanne Simmons said...

    cbell, I'm agree with you! I would much rather read in third person, too.

    Believe me, finding something new and original to bring to the vampire story tradition was the greatest challenge I faced when I started writing in the genre. In fact, I wouldn't have written NIGHT LIFE if I hadn't been able to find my own way of telling that story. I even discussed it beforehand with our very own Jayne Ann, who is so smart and insightful about the book business. :-)

    Suzanne
    aka Elizabeth Guest

    7:49 AM  
    Anonymous JenMH from VA said...

    Jayne,

    I started on the vampires with Sherrilyn Kenyon and Christine Feehan - great authors to start anything with! But I confess that I have largely burned out on the concept (not the authors). It wasn't the "vampire" angle that I thought made Kenyon's or Feehan's work special. For Kenyon, there is a great central character in her "Dark Hunter" series, Acheron. When "Ash" is in the room, her stories rock. And she built a fantastic mythology to her world, and supported the book series with a killer web site. Feehan writes fabulous alpha males, but the real power in all of the series she writes is her treatment of sibling relationships. She is from a large family, and has about 10 children of her own, and the importance of sibling relationships to her personally really shows in her work. So, even though both of those authors have made a big name in the vamp sub-genre, I actually think the characteristics that make their work special could play in a lot of genres.

    I love the Arcane series thus far, but I love all of your Amanda Quick books, so that's no surprise. And take us back to Harmony any time you're ready! (grin)

    JenMH from Virginia

    9:00 AM  
    Blogger DFender said...

    Which of the many aspects of the vast new paranormal sub-genre appeal to you?
    Huh. I've never thought about it. Go figure. I guess it must be the fact that the stories are about a well-known myth (yes, MYTH...lol) that I enjoy reading another persons (author) take on the subject from their imagination. I also enjoy the community and family structures built around the subject/characters.

    Which ones do you love and which do you avoid?
    I enjoy Sherrilyn Kenyon's Dark Hunter world, the world of Christine Feehan's Carpathians and the Laurell K. Hamilton really-weird-really-erotic world. Katie McAllister's (and her Dark Ones) sense of humor rocks. I don't really avoid any specifically... I'll try an author in this sub-genre at least once and if the book doesn't REALLY grab me I'll pass on the next since, hey, my reading time is important! I gotta save it for the really good stuff!

    Great blog, Jayne... Your psychic paranormals are great... looking forward to the rest of the Arcane Society books.

    Happy Thanksgiving Week!
    Deb

    9:30 AM  
    Blogger Brandy said...

    I read very few Vampire novels, I prefer that part of my paranormal/supernatural reading to be "light". However, I love your psychic books! I am so looking forward to White Lies!!

    9:59 AM  
    Anonymous Tammy said...

    Jayne,

    As for going along with the rest of the crowd when it comes to vampires and how the act, etc., you could do what LKH, AND a few others have done - create a new way to see vampires.

    DFender said - Which ones do you love and which do you avoid?
    I enjoy Sherrilyn Kenyon's Dark Hunter world, the world of Christine Feehan's Carpathians and the Laurell K. Hamilton really-weird-really-erotic world. Katie McAllister's (and her Dark Ones) sense of humor rocks. I don't really avoid any specifically... I'll try an author in this sub-genre at least once - and I have to agree. Sometimes I'll give thema second try - as was the case with J R Ward's Brotherhood series, at first it didn't appeal to me, but by the time I read the 2nd book - I was hooked.

    10:28 AM  
    Blogger Stella said...

    Some provocative comments. BTW, TV and microwaves are still a mystery to me.

    Jayne, you create a dynamic world, a believable world. I think that's what counts for me, that there be some sense of humanity in whatever I read.

    That said, I will read anything, at least once!

    For me, as a writer, I play my own games and they do include the magical and the fanciful--and the outrageous--all of which are absolutely real to me as I write and as I think about my stories.

    Great topic,
    Stella

    11:29 AM  
    Blogger DFender said...

    Duh @ myownself... Tammy kindly reminds me -

    J.R. Ward's Black Dagger Brotherhood is among my very favorites in this genre... I must not equate them with Vampires since the guys are oh-so-alpha...rowr... LOL

    1:40 PM  
    Blogger wavybrains said...

    Count me as someone excited to hear that you're not plotting a vampire novel. I've read a number of vampire books--even those by my favorite authors--and they just don't do it for me. Even at their sexiest--it's still VAMPIRES. And dude, he's sucking her BLOOD. I just can't get beyond the ick factor. It's lovely to have choices in the bookstore--if all books became paranormals or vampire or any other single genre, what a boring world that would be!

    3:25 PM  
    Anonymous Louis said...

    I don't enjoy Vampire books....have read a few...NR's recent trilogy for instance, which is relatively mild.
    I do enjoy the world of "Harmony" that you have created as Jayne Castle. It has a "realness" that appeals to me.

    Your JAK "Arcane" world also appeals to me. Looking forward to "White Lies".

    Thanks to all the Quills for last nights chat on Writerspace. Some excellent questions.

    Louis (ellorenka)

    5:14 PM  
    Anonymous Beth W. said...

    I'm so glad to read I'm not the only one who doesn't like vampires - they just don't appeal to me on any level.

    I'm not big into paranormal of any kind, but psychic type stuff doesn't bother me quite as much. But I typically don't read paranormals.

    6:34 PM  
    Anonymous Ranurgis said...

    I'm pretty much with Beth on this subject as I've probably indicated previously. I will read the occasional werewolf story unless it's too gory but demons, vampires, and such--forget it.

    The psychic may confuse me at times but I know people who do have a sixth sense. So for me, it's not beyond the realm of normal understanding. Like you, Jayne, I wouldn't be able to suspend my basic beliefs and tenets to write a paranormal and find it difficult even to read them. I believe for one thing, that Satan is alive and well and doing all he can to corrupt us. But it's not in the way the books portray. I'm more in the line of C.S. Lewis in his "Screwtape Letters".

    So I can handle time-travel and the like as well as psychic powers as long as they are for good or neutral use. I myself would never go to a psychic. I don't believe in that. As I said above, it's more the sixth sense that people have about certain things that I believe in, especially if they restrict it to their own use and don't try to push it on other people. I don't even like to watch "magic" shows because I don't understand how it's done. They give me a creepy feeling.

    Actually, this was one of the questions that I had wanted to ask you on the chat yesterday: how your interest in the more psychic was aroused and put into your stories.

    7:38 PM  
    Anonymous Ranurgis said...

    Just another word on this: if any of you ladies decided to write a vampire novel like Suzanne did, I'd certainly try to read it. I don't know how far I'd get but it really does depend on how things are portrayed. The only werewolf stories I've read so far, are, to put it bluntly, by Susan Krinard. We spoke about them at the RT Convention in Toronto in 1999 and she convinced me to give them a try. And I like her books--so far. I haven't read them all. I don't like horror either though I have found one author whose "horror" I don't mind.

    It really does depend on how things are presented. For instance, there are a number of deaths in the horror books but the writer doesn't wallow in blood and gore, just states the facts. That I can take.

    So, yes Suzanne, I do intend to read your book and maybe even books.

    7:50 PM  
    Blogger Jayne Ann Krentz said...

    Regardless of where everyone stands on this issue, one thing is clear: We are obviously an adventurous group of readers. I gotta tell you, that is not always true in some of the other genres. Over here in the romance genre, most of us are willing to give a new twist a try. That's one of the many things I love about writing for this crowd.

    8:16 PM  
    Blogger Estella said...

    I like all of the paranormal sub-genres.

    8:24 PM  
    Blogger Karibear said...

    Just another bit - anyone who doesn't think werewolves can be fascinating people should read Donna Boyd's books, The Passion and The Promise. [I couldn't remember her name, but the books will stay in my mind forever- so I did a search in Powell's. Do you all have ANY IDEA how many books there are that have 'the promise' in the title?!]

    8:31 PM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    If you haven't read J R Ward's Dark Lover, Lover Eternal and Lover Awakened you are missing a real treat! J R Ward is fantastic, and her BDB series are some of the best books I have read! If you haven't given them a go, vampire liking or not, RUN don't walk to your nearest library or bookshop and get your hands on them. They are keepers, wonderful lovestories, non gorey, and not too violent.... give them a go, they are GREAT! Sian fromNZ

    10:49 PM  
    Anonymous Carrie from Wisconsin said...

    bummer, I missed the chat!!!

    12:29 AM  
    Blogger Lori Foster said...

    Great blog, Jayne. As yet, I can't bend my creative mind around a vampire. I enjoy reading them, but when an idea kicks for me, I naturally go through the whole living process for the couple... and it leads into eternity. I dunno... it just doesn't work for me. I love life as it is too much.

    Happy reading all!

    Lori

    4:39 AM  
    Blogger Suzanne Simmons said...

    ranurgis, I hope you find my "vampires" to your "taste." (Sorry, I couldn't resist the pun.:-)

    I don't want to give too much of my plot away, but my vampire paranormals are elegant, not bloody. They are simply another take/version of my favorite theme in romance: One man; one woman. Eternal love and love as redemption.

    Happy Thanksgiving all!

    8:20 AM  
    Blogger Cbell said...

    I agree with Tammy on JR Ward's Brotherhood series. Those are some SERIOUS Alpha Males. I also enjoyed the Nora Roberts trilogy and have shared those with my friends here in the office.

    It's gotta be that brooding, dark male figure lurks in the shadows. What's he doing there lurking? Hunting or Protecting? Great stories come out either way.

    9:00 AM  
    Blogger btuda said...

    I've always wondered why in paranormals the good vs evil fight usually deals with our typical vampires, werewolves and witches, but not angels. Granted, removing the heavy religious aspect could get tricky, but we've removed the stain of evil from our paranormal heroes. We have vampires with souls and good witches, but very few if any warrior angels - at least not that I've found. We read about our "fallen angel" heroes, right?

    Back to some of the original questions, I love the theme of redemption in paranormals. I'm a big fan of both the original movie and the series of Buffy, LKH's Anita Blake series, Katie MacAllister, MaryJanice Davidson, and Charlaine Harris. Yep, I'm all over the place.

    What I love about paranormals is that little something extra - a magical power, a force to overcome or redeeming oneself.

    Yes, vampires actually drinking blood has a serious ick factor, but a really good kiss on the neck? Hell-o, dark and mysterious (just ignore my husband rolling his eyes in the background here).

    10:10 AM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    I don't like gore! But a vampire story about good guys who have dietary issues, such as Christine Feehan or Lyndsay Sands, get my vote. I enjoy the imagination & good story telling that can result from the world building these types of books require. Vampires, shapeshifters, elves, fairies, psychic powers, etc., can let the fantasy expand into different realms. However, underlying all of the fantastical happenings, there must be a good love story with a happy and satisfying ending. If not, then you won't find me spending my money on any future books the author writes. That is one of the reasons I really appreciate all of the good sources of info on upcoming books such as Romantic Times and other websites that review books.

    1:28 PM  
    Blogger Karibear said...

    Back again. there are stories about angels, just mostly not romantic ones. Jane Roberts comes to mind, with The Education of Oversoul 7 and The Further Education of Oversoul 7.

    On the other hand - there was a book a few years ago, a good one, and I've forgotten both the name of it and the author, where a guardian angel came to Earth and fell in love with his guardee, and gave up being an angel for a second chance at life, with all it's trials and tribulations.

    Then there are the so-called children's books by Madeleine L'Engle - my favorite being Ring of Bright Water, and the only reason I can think of why it was considered children's lit is that there is no outright romance in it.

    3:53 PM  
    Anonymous Louis said...

    Karibear....

    Could it be Anne Stuart's "Falling Angel". It sounds like it could be.

    4:58 PM  
    Blogger Tammyg said...

    I've always had a hard time getting into any paranormal plots. That's why I was surprised how much I've always enjoyed the Jayne Castle books. I read all 3 genres written by Jayne Ann Krentz. I've read some other authors' books with paranormal plots and just never could really get into them. I guess I'm just drawn to the characters of a Krentz novel :>)

    6:38 PM  
    Blogger Jay said...

    There's little in the paranormal sub-genres that I won't read - I tend to steer clear of witchcraft in any form, because it's such a deep and intricate thing that too many get it wrong, and that offends me on some level.

    I love vampires. As long as the story doesn't cross the line into outright gore, the blood factor doesn't bother me. And they're so damned hot. *g*

    If I was going to recommend anything from a supernatural aspect, I'd say Christine Feehan, Kelley Armstrong, Charlaine Harris, Sherrilyn Kenyon and Tanya Huff's Victory Nelson series.

    If you have a strong stomach and a sense of humour, try Wynette Hoffman's Blood Is Thicker Than Water.

    And Jayne, I tend to agree with you about the line between psychic and supernatural. Psychic exists, has been tested and measured and proven in our human reality. Supernatural is the product of the imagination that has yet to be captured by the burden of proof.

    7:15 PM  
    Anonymous Carrie from Wisconsin said...

    "btuda said...

    I've always wondered why in paranormals the good vs evil fight usually deals with our typical vampires, werewolves and witches, but not angels. Granted, removing the heavy religious aspect could get tricky, but we've removed the stain of evil from our paranormal heroes. We have vampires with souls and good witches, but very few if any warrior angels - at least not that I've found. We read about our "fallen angel" heroes, right?"

    As I love good vs. evil plot in a story, there is one angel that I can think of, but he was on TV and his name was Leo. For those of you that do not recognize the name, Leo was the "white lighter" or guardian angel of current and future do-gooders on the TV series "Charmed". He was sexy, sensitive, loving and a very fierce warrior when he needed to be. His character was all well and good, but very passive the first 4 years of the show. It wasn't until he became a father that his idea about pacifism changed. This leads me to answer why it's hard to write about warrior angels, because they are pacifists by nature.

    The story Karibear mentioned reminded me of the movie "City of Angels" with Meg Ryan and Nick Cage. I'm not sure if the movie was based on a novel similar to that named by Louis or not.

    Yes, I definitely agree that there is a distinct difference between psychic and supernatural. As with any other topic in any other genre, the setting, events and characters have to seem realistic. If they don't have realism, then any paranormal or supernatural happenings will lose credibility and the entire storyline falls apart. That's why I tend to be leary of books and such that deal with these matters. However, when there are writers such as Jayne Krentz and Patricia Cornwell, some of the unbelieveable becomes believeable because of the rich research that goes into the details surrounding ideas like mesmerism and psychic events.

    Carrie

    9:11 PM  
    Anonymous Carrie from Wisconsin said...

    I also want to give a hearty thanks to all of the other authors and readers here in the Quills' blogs. Because of you my reading list has jumped so high I have lost track. I appreciate all of the comments and input about these different series, novels and authors. They've all been extremely helpful!!

    Carrie

    9:15 PM  
    Blogger Karibear said...

    Louis said: Could it be Anne Stuart's "Falling Angel". It sounds like it could be.

    I really don't know. It was something I read maybe 30 years ago, and at times I blank on writers and titles, even though I remember the story. It took place in the southeastern states, either Georgia or one of the Carolinas. I'm be surprised if more than one writer didn't do something along those lines, there are so many other books with similar plots but different POVs. Look at how many variations there are on the legend of the Wandering Jew.

    12:31 AM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    I never really like psychics in general but supernatural on the other hand makes things more interesting.

    I'm currently reading this series with death gods who like vampires will die if struck with the right weapon.

    Personally I'm sick of psychics and vampires (werewolves not yet) because they are EVERYWHERE!! I'm so over them!

    P

    4:21 AM  
    Blogger Lori Foster said...

    Suzanne, I *never* thought I'd enjoy a vampire story until a friend literally forced one of Christine Feehan's novels on me. I was hooked from the opening!
    I'm looking forward to your new series and I'm sure it's going to be a mega hit.

    HUGS!

    Lori

    4:27 AM  
    Blogger Kris said...

    With the idea of keeping my vampire reading "light", I would recommend a read that I just finished called "Because I'm the Vampire, That's Why" by Michele Bardsley.

    It's a funny, campy vampire book written in the first person from the point of view of a middle-aged, single mother of two who gets attacked and turned into a vampire one night while taking out the garbage.

    So hilarious.

    7:15 AM  
    Blogger Suzanne Simmons said...

    Thank you for the good wishes, Lori. Although my take on the vampire tradition is very different than Christine Feehan's, we both write a very romantic version of the story: essentially two people destined for each other.

    8:48 AM  
    Blogger Lucy S. said...

    I like the positive angle in the vampires stories - such as from Christine Feehan, Mary Janice Davidson, Robin McKinkley, etc. - and there are many more vampire books that I've enjoyed, too. (But,I do not like the ones that are excessively destructive or pessimistic about humankind's future...too depressing.)

    But... definitely, I do love the Jayne Castle books, where the female and male psychic energies meet in another dimension and then combine to become a larger force. Through their cooperation and mutual respect, the female and male forces combine to solve the mystery. I love that!

    I think that angle on the psychic world meeting in another dimension is very hip - since contemporary science is very interested in the superstring theory and the possibility that we are living in multiple dimensions (either 10 or 11 diminsions - depending on which theory version you believe). Brian Greene had that PBS TV special based on his best-selling science book on superstring theory and The Elegant Universe - very fascinating theory.


    So a storyline that can draw in on that psychic dimension, and tell a good adventure story at the same time, is way cool!

    I think the Arcane series should be great, too. I've read the first one, and look forward to reading more in this series.

    11:21 AM  
    Blogger elizabeth said...

    Jayne, if you write it, I'll read it!

    11:31 AM  
    Blogger Deborah said...

    Leave the vampires alone. Nora Roberts tried and they were the worst thing she has written. I love your books and hope you continue with the Arcane series.

    7:30 AM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    The best Vamp novels I have read are the black Dagger Brotherhood by JR WARD, they are amazing, everythign you want in a vamp, alpha, hot, sexy.

    6:34 PM  
    Anonymous anng said...

    Jayne: I LOVE your paranormal books. They are my favorites!!!! I also love fantasy and sci fi both in the romance genre and w/o romance. But I do NOT read vampire books. No matter how "nice" they are, they are vampires and for me, I can't get beyond the fact that vampires are "evil". Count me among those who are happy that you are NOT writing one. Because if you did, I'd be forced to read it and I REALLY don't want to!!

    1:23 PM  
    Blogger angelblue857 said...

    I love your "Curtain" series. PLEASE keep writing them!
    Love some of the vampire series, can't stand some of the others, totally neutral about the rest.
    The werewolf, faery creature stories fall into the same catagory as the vampire stories.
    I avoid the witch paranormals altogether.

    10:13 AM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    I've noticed alot of people who start reading one particular author, tend to gravitate to another. I myself, started with Christine Feehan's 'Carpathian' novels. The dominate alpha males and the thought of 'being light to his darkness' was uber-romantic, then I found Sherilyn Kenyon, again, the underling stories bordered on the same idea. That the heroine would ultimately save the hero. I've also started with Laurell K Hamilton's Anita Blake series. A bit different, with the first 4-5 novels being mainly about her reputation of 'killing vampires' instead of bedding them, but still, the attraction was there from my previous experience with the other authors. It just keeps building, and while I loved Amanda Quick and the regency romances, now I've discovered the Arcane House books, and Yay for me! I think it's mainly about re-telling an old tale, and taking a new POV that makes the vampire and paranormal genre so popular these days.

    9:21 AM  

    Post a Comment

    << Home

    Powered by Blogger