Running With Quills, Blogsite for Jayne Ann Krentz, Elizabeth Lowell, Stella Cameron, and Suzanne Simmons
Susan Andersen
Suzanne Simmons



Stella Cameron
Stella Cameron




Lori Foster
Suzanne Simmons



Jayne Ann Krentz
Jayne Ann Krentz




Elizabeth Lowell
Elizabeth Lowell




Suzanne Simmons
Suzanne Simmons











  • Welcome to Running With Quills, your online newsletter designed to keep you up to date with what your favorite authors (that would be us) are doing throughout the year. Here you will find the release dates of our new books and get information about our backlists. We'll preview our cover art here long before the books hit the stores and we'll keep you informed about works-in-progress and special projects. You'll also receive advance notice of signings and appearances. From time to time we'll give you a peek at our worlds, tell you what we're reading, and introduce you to some new authors.

    Thursday, November 16, 2006

    Journey of the Covers

    Today I wanted to talk about covers.
    Yeah, yeah, I know most of you will say that you don't judge books by the covers.
    But a lot of readers do, or publishers wouldn't have huge art departments.
    They wouldn't have meetings to discuss the artwork for the covers.
    They wouldn't "go back to the board" on covers that they feel aren't quite right.


    And writers everywhere live for the day that they get cover approval.

    Ahhh... cover approval. My most coveted perk.

    Yeah, it was a dream thing for me.
    I felt I'd finally "made it" when I got cover approval.
    I'd reached one of my biggest goals, scaled the toughest peak.
    Sound dramatic? Hah!
    You haven't seen some of my really stinko covers.


    So that's what I'm going to talk about today. My little perspective on the journey of the covers I've had. Through reissues, some have morphed from the ugly duckling into the beautiful (and appropriate) swan.

    These days, most of my covers are awesome. The ones that don't blow me away are still good enough that I trust the art department's opinion. After all, that's the biz they're in and I can't always be objective.
    Books aren't my babies, but they do represent several months of hard work and a lot of creative energy and I really, really get visuals, especially of my heroes.

    What is that?

    C'mon, you know you're asking that right now.
    Well folks, that's the first cover for Sawyer, a category book I wrote for Harlequin way back when.

    The first of a 4 book series.

    Scary, huh?

    Yeah, I wasn't too happy. Believe it or not, this is a revised version. In the original, he had no neck at all. And his chin was really pointy.
    I know, I know. His eyes are still crossed and he looks really confused, but at least he doesn't have a pointy chin anymore. (I always try to look on the bright side!)

    Here's the example I sent Harlequin, to show what Sawyer should look like.

    What? You say he looks nothing like the guy in the cover? Really? Huh. (Picture me laughing, cuz I am. I wasn't at the time of that cover, but I laugh now.)

    The hunk on the right would be mightily insulted if he saw that warped impression of himself.


    I was mightily insulted for him!

    In case you're curious, (and I'm just positive that you are!) I'm going to show you the other 4 covers and my original "ideas" of what they should look like.




    The guy on this cover reminds me of William H. Macy. Great actor... but not the hero image I'd written.








    This cover came the closest to matching the image I had.
    It wasn't quite right, but at the least the guy isn't a mutant.










    Little white dog?
    There's no little white dog!







    Okay, so what's the upside of all this?
    Harlequin reissued the books once already, and the result was much, much better!


    Isn't that a nicer cover treatment for my books!? I think so.
    Once and Again featured the Sawyer/Morgan books.
    Forever and Always featured the Gabe/Jordan books.








    Next March, Harlequin is reissuing all 4 books again as single titles.
    Same titles, all new look.
    I love these new covers for a variety of reasons that I'll share...
    right after I show them to you.













    Nice, huh!?
    When Harlequin does a cover right, they really do it right.

    The important elements on these covers, in my never-very-humble opinion, are:

    A. They're attractive. The men are good looking and rugged.
    B. They bright. Smoky dark covers have their purposes, but these aren't smoky dark books.
    C. They've kept the original titles, so readers won't be confused thinking these are new releases.
    (I try to make it clear to readers what is new and what isn't. I have a couple of pages on my website - the reissue page and the connected book and series page - dedicated to that.)
    D. They still have a "category" look, which I think is important because they are category books.

    It doesn't matter if I've grown as an author, or that I no longer write in category.
    (No slight to category authors at all. It is one tough job to write a category length book that covers all the bases of compelling plot, great characterization, and fast pacing. Categories were some of the hardest books I ever tackled.)
    Because the books have such a fresh new look, it could mislead readers to think these are single titles. They don't read like single titles, though, and that's an important distinction.

    So look at how those covers have changed! From hideous to really pretty nice.
    Interesting, huh? I think so.


    Another interesting facet of book covers is how the images can show up in multiple places.
    You know I have examples for you, right?

    This is my Too Much Temptation cover:


    And this is from a magazine:










    Very cool similarities, don't you think! I always wondered if one inspired the other.

    And check this out! Same image, two different books. Both look great!















    And...





    You know that's the same pair of shoes!
    But I love how they made the image look so different on the two covers.






    And lastly, for a little thrill...
    (hope I don't get tossed out of Quills for this)
    ...a nekkid photo of my Say No To Joe cover (foreign) and the same tush for a foreign Robin Schone!

    Titillating, doncha think?

    By now you're probably either bored, or as fascinated by all the incarnations of covers as I am!
    My favorites?
    Obviously something that represents the book. But not a "sex in your face" type of cover. I don't care for those. I think our work should be the draw, not the suggestion of "hot sex."


    At the same time, I want readers to know what they're getting. So I love the nice, bold covers with a sexy stepback. I also loved the covers on Catherine Coulter's Sherbrook series. And Brenda Joyce's early "Fire" series.

    You know that thing about cover approval?
    Well, for an upcoming book, the stepback had a fighter - a very sexy dude leaning on a wall in work-out gear, all sweaty and macho.
    But he had on the wrong gloves for the type of fighter I write. He wore regular boxing gloves when my fighters wear either 4 or 6 oz fingerless gloves.

    Bless my publisher, they listened and changed it for me. To make it easy, they just took off the gloves. He still looks like a fighter, but now he's not the wrong fighter.
    Yeah, I LOVE cover approval!

    So what's your favorite type cover?
    Images, like flowers or shoes (see Bryan's cover!)
    Scenery? Characters (but only when they get them right!)?
    Note: I've had the wrong characters on my books a couple of times. The one that comes most to mind was with a volumptuous redhead as heroine, and on the cover, the hero is atop (in a sexy pose) a scrawny blonde babe. The cheating swine!)

    I've seen some stinko covers, and suffered for the writer.
    I've seen some fab covers, and turned green with envy.


    I've seen some that boggled my mind.

    What about you?
    Can you name a cover you loved?

    What about "bad" covers bugs you the most?

    I could go on and on - but this puppy has gotten long enough!

    Happy Friday everyone!

    34 Comments:

    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    Good cover - bad cover, a tricky question. Not only do people have different opionions on this one, but each individual changes through the years and his/her taste as well. Covers I liked in my early twenties make me cringe now that I´m just around the corner of hitting forty.
    Basically I want accuracy. If the hero is black haired then I hate to see a blond on the cover. It the story takes place in the mountains, then I won´t be too happy to see a beach scene.
    In the end I try to ignore the covers, but not always successfully.
    Worst cover I can remember - well none actually comes to mind.
    Best cover - too many to mention.
    Sirry

    4:17 AM  
    Blogger Jayne Ann Krentz said...

    Oh, my, Lori, what a terrific riff on the problems of cover art! The amazing thing is that everyone involved actually wants a good cover for the book. And, after so many years of experience, one would think the art departments would know how to produce great cover art. But art is art and, evidently, highly unpredictable. Sigh.

    8:11 AM  
    Blogger kim said...

    they are hot

    9:35 AM  
    Blogger Karibear said...

    Covers... The only ones that stand out are the one for Atlas Shrugged back in the '60s and Seven Arrows by Hyemeohsts Storm. As for the the rest, what makes them good is having the right writer's name on it!

    9:43 AM  
    Blogger DFender said...

    Dearest Lori,

    *thud*thud* Adrian Paul... Adrian Paul... my favorite... Adrian...*thud*thud*

    Uh.. Lori,
    Yes, that's what I was doing. Anyway, covers. Focus on cover art. LOL

    Some of my most recent favorite covers are from J.R. Ward's "Black Dagger Brotherhood" series. Tara Janzen's "Crazy" series covers are great...James Bond-ish. Stella's "A Grave Mistake" has a terrific cover. These covers definitely fit the stories, that's for sure.

    I prefer covers that somehow reflect the story as I'm sure most readers do. I can do without the hearts and flowers stuff. An original style catches my eye. Scenery if it matches the story of course.

    The very worst covers are, as you mentioned, ones that do not nearly match the characters, setting or genre of the story.

    I love when covers reflect a series as far as the cover design goes. It really catches the eye if you've jumped into a series or connected stories and you're looking to buy the previous titles. Easy to recognize the series/connected story cover theme if you get my meaning.

    Okay, so... back to my day-dream-fantasy-slobber-fest...

    Happy Friday, Lori...and all :-)

    Deb

    10:49 AM  
    Blogger Jennifer Y. said...

    I loved this post!

    I am so excited that they are re-releasing the Buckhorn brothers books...I missed them the first time around (and apparently the second if they have already been re-released once...LOL).

    11:08 AM  
    Blogger Ladytink_534 said...

    I LOVED the original covers for Diana Gabaldon's Outlander series but now they are all plain. I hate it when the cover of the book doesn't match anything inside too. I know, I know "don't judge a book by it's cover" but I do. If it's a recommended book then it doesn't matter that much but if it's a book I just happen to pick up somewhere, you had better believe that it had an interesting cover.

    11:36 AM  
    Blogger Lori Foster said...

    Sirry, you make a GREAT point that I wish I had put in my stupid blog.
    Publishers do NOT reissue books with new art just to try to rip off unsuspecting readers so that they'll buy the same book twice.
    :::sigh::: I hear that accusation a lot online. But as you said, the times change, and no one with a brain would reissue a book with a dated cover! We buy new furniture, new clothes... and sometimes our books need new covers. :-)

    Hey Jayne. Yeah, art is like beauty. It's all in the eye of the beholder. LOL. I've had friends with covers they hated, that I liked, and vice versa. And I'm positive no art dept anywhere ever set out to do a "bad" cover!

    So Deb, I gather you're an Adrian fan? LOL Me, too!

    ladytink, I think everyone, to some degree, judges a book by the cover. We're mostly visual people!

    Jennifer, I hope you enjoy the Buckhorns. I'm glad Hq is reissuing them too - and making them oh-so-much prettier! LOL

    So today we caught another stray cat! That makes 4 of the 6 strays that "hang" at our house, now with their shots and all of them "fixed." I feel like we've accomplished sooo much! LOL

    Lori

    12:16 PM  
    Blogger wavybrains said...

    I loved this post because I just finished reading "Unexpected." I LOVED the book--but the cover? One of my least favorites of yours. It's funny how much the cover influences reader decisions/opinions. I love the new re-issue covers, but I loved the orginals too. My favorite cover of yours so far is the "Tempted" collection and I love the fruity "Too much temptation" cover.

    12:20 PM  
    Anonymous AgTigress said...

    Three of Jayne's contemporaries came out in paperback with great covers: Sharp Edges, Deep Waters and Flash: abstract, edgy, grown-up cover art. Pity there isn't more of it around.
    :-)

    12:47 PM  
    Blogger Stella said...

    Wow, Lori--mostly darn good covers, I'd say. They always stand out and particularly with recent ones I think simplicity has a lot to do with that.

    Thank you for the cover discussion, it's so interesting to so many of us.

    Cheers, Stella

    4:15 PM  
    Anonymous Carrie from Wisconsin said...

    Hi Lori,

    In one of my publishing courses I had a wonderful opportunity to interview the editor, Bruce Murphy, of a locally published "Milwaukee Magazine". One of the issues we discussed was cover art and how huge it's influence is on market acceptance/rejection by the audience.

    For example, the cover that caught my attention to the magazine had a yellow background with a huge cow centered below the title of "Cheese Wars". For those who are unfamiliar, the battle for cheesedom is being waged by California upon our lovely state. Anyway, the article was fablulous. It discussed how there are some 350 cheeses that are made in various areas of Wisconsin and different cheeses were rated. The article was well-written, and very tempting. I basiclly had to get some of my favorite cheese (Widmer's Brick), rated 7th overall, at the local cheese mart after finishing the article. However, when I mentioned that issue, he cringed.

    Why? Because that issue bombed on the stands. Why? From what they have been able to determine, it had something to do with an over-association of the cow with Wisconsin. It was a case of over-saturation. While I liked the cover and found it very humorous and happy to see the notion of cheese war finally addressed, the major public did turn away.

    Could there be another reason why they really did turn away? Well, I have often pondered this and I have come to this conclusion: People were most-likely offended that California's attempt to break into our cheese market had been given credence. What I mean to say is that I have been to California and had "real-California cheese", it was cheddar, and I thought how could anyone mess up cheddar. Well, Wisconsin Cheddar kicks but when compared to California's version of it. (I could go on and on here, but I'll refrain). Hands down winner of the competition is Wisconsin. I'm not a farmer, I am a consumer, a regular suburban-city girl who grew up eating Wisconsin Cheese. I let my tastebuds decide the winner. It wouldn't surprise me that people didn't buy the issue because they felt that the quality of our cheese speaks for itself and the campaign should have been ignored.

    What does a magazine cover have to do with a book cover? A lot. Just like a good magazine cover attracts readers, a bad cover will turn them away. During the course of my interview, I was given the opportunity to see some cover art. There were some that were very beautiful and creative but, according to Mr. Murphy, would never make it as a cover because they just didn't have that "hook" or that eye-grabbing quality a cover needs. Book covers do the same thing, as many of the other readers have stated. The same kind of market strategies are generally applied to book sales as to magazine sales. Public pollls, etc. Unfortunately, those that create the cover art don't always read the book they are designing for so they guess at what they think the cover should be according to known stats and figures (what draws the most sales), which is why I am all for an author having final cover art say.

    Some of my favortie art is from Sci-Fi stuff such as the Otherland series and R.A. Salvatore's Dark Elf series. The cover art in these books always represents the characters/setting in some way. I've always found that to be the case with sci-fi/fantasy or mysteries. As for why covers change with a new release, sometimes it isn't just the times that make that happen, it could be rights to the cover art belong to someone else and it's not worth the effort to gain those rights.

    Call me old fashioned, but I do like a cover that personifies the main characters and depicts the setting of the book. Even though it's described in the book, the illustrations can really help. What I also prefer are covers that leave something to the imagination. What I don't like is when the cover art gets in the way of my view of the story. I guess that's why I prefer illustrations to live pics. Illustrations make the characters more mysterious, where a real-life looking image takes some of that mystery away. In my opinion anyway. I want the mystery, I want the creative wonderings about the character inspired by the illustration. In some cases, I like to be able to define the way the characters look as I read. Yes, I'll have the descriptions, but the story provides the whole picture. I guess I do not like the real-looking art because it solidifies the picture of the character and doesn't allow for "change" throughout the story. That's what I have discovered in all my years of reading novels. Besides, what many people find attractive is not what I would find attractive and vice versa.

    I don't know if it's my favorite cover, but it is one that has stayed with me over the years was from Irene Hunt's "Up a Road Slowly" (Copyright 1996). It was an illustrated cover. There was something about the look in the girl's eyes that is hard to get in real-life depictions. It's like there is this sense of longing and yet a sense of sadness. The way the eyes and face are drawn, it's as if the two enotions aren't connected to each other but exist in a sort-of torment to the young girl. I guess I found it one of the most powerful covers in a long time.

    Poor color combinations can also be a big turn-off. That'll be enough to turn me away from the book. If I can't tolerate looking at the cover, I generally will ignore the book and move on. Again, it's a thing of mine.

    Well, happy Friday everyone!!

    Carrie

    4:23 PM  
    Anonymous AgTigress said...

    One aspect of cover 'art' that is not often mentioned is that there are cultural/national differences in reader preferences. This is one of many reasons why a reader should never be influenced by the cover, the ephemeral 'wrapping paper', when choosing a book: if the cover art was designed in the USA and the reader is European, she will not be reading the iconography and design in the way envisaged by the publisher's art department anyway.

    3:02 AM  
    Blogger Lori Foster said...

    Hey wavybrains (I love that user name!) what didn't like you about the Unexpected cover? I sorta liked it. All but the stork, which I thought gave away too much. Share!

    Agtigress, one of my favorite covers of Jayne's was the original for Gift of... Gold? Fire? Which one came first? I can't remember now. But oh-my-oh-my. That image of Jonas! I was in love with him for awhile I think. He looked mega awesome on that cover!

    Stella, I'm with you on the simplicity. I don't like cluttered covers at all. And when there's too much text, it really distracts from the impact, imo.

    Happy Saturday!

    Lori

    3:16 AM  
    Blogger Lori Foster said...

    Hey Carrie. Great reply! But you know, I'm not sure that the cover of that magazine had anything to do with it not doing well. So many things can factor in. When Diana died, a lot of books sat on the shelves. It wasn't because of the covers.
    With 911, romance sales soared, often whether the cover sucked raw eggs or was pure inspiration. It had more to do with people wanting the escape of happy entertainment vs harsh reality.
    Covers matter, for sure. But we can't discount other influences. Who knows what was going on in the lives of the public when that magazine didn't do well?

    Thanks for such a thought-provoking post!

    Lori

    3:18 AM  
    Blogger Lori Foster said...

    Great point, agtigress! I suppose that's why so many of our foreign covers are done differently from our original covers.

    I'm off to do two booksignings in Troy, Ohio today. I'm looking forward to visiting with my good friend Dianne Castell during the ride up to Troy and back.

    Everyone be well and enjoy this beautiful day!

    HUGS,

    Lori

    3:20 AM  
    Blogger Jacki Bentley said...

    Fascinating stuff on book covers, Lori!

    I was at my first ever signing in Cleveland last weekend -- all the proceeds went to breast cancer as you know. Even though you weren’t able to attend, I saw the readers grabbing lots of your great books!

    10:14 AM  
    Blogger Lori Foster said...

    Hey Jacki!
    Would that be the conference with Erin McCarthy!? One of these days I'll make it up there.
    So how did your signing go? Hope you had a blast.
    Thanks for dropping in.

    Lori

    6:10 PM  
    Anonymous Ranurgis said...

    Well, since I've always looked more at the author than the cover, I'd say that what the cover looks like doesn't bother me all that much.

    It really doesn't but I loved the covers by PINO and Gregg (forget his last name). They weren't necessarily clinches but gave a romantic image to historcals in general. Pino also did contemporaries and his trademark was little flowers somewhere on the cover.

    I may have related the story of the worst cover I ever saw already here. The blond woman looked like a screaming harridan facing a soldier carrying a musket. Like the cover with the dog, there was no such encounter anywhere in the book "Dawn's Early Light" by Elswyth Thane. If I hadn't read the book previously, or something else by the author, I would have left it in the used bookstore I found it in. But I wouldn't have a copy of one of my favorite books then. I'll have to take a photo of it sometime and send it to either Elizabeth or you. You both seem to have had some really bad luck with covers.

    On the whole, I'll take what's there. I have very few preconceived notions about covers. However, I can tell when there's a really bad one. Another was in Suzanne Brockmann's Tall, Dark and Dangerous series by SIM. She kept telling readers about this model-handsome guy in the SEALS. When Lucky's book came out, he looked as if he'd contracted a bad case of mumps. So all the ones bought through Suz came with a smiley for the cover.

    8:04 PM  
    Anonymous Ranurgis said...

    Oh, and have I mentioned here that I've seen some of the same covers used here on books in Germany? Were they on the same books? Nope. At least by the same author? Nope again. I think they just buy a bunch of cover images and stick them on whichever book is next in line for a cover.

    8:15 PM  
    Anonymous AgTigress said...

    The ‘cover-art’ debate comes up on one discussion site or another at least four times a year, so I find I am always repeating myself. I do understand why it matters to authors and publishers – believe me, I have been there, and I know about the alleged effects on sales – but it seems to me that the most sensible thing for all readers to do is never to allow it to influence them one way or the other.

    As Lori has pointed out, second and subsequent editions are given different cover designs, often far more acceptable ones if the author has become well-known outside the category market. There are continually changing trends and fashions in these matters; the studies of reader demographics (usually skewed anyway) evolve and change; each new generation of marketing person wishes to put its own personal stamp on the ‘look’ of a line; buyers in different countries have different visual/graphic preferences. Market researchers may sometimes establish what some readers like in a cover design, but as yet, I don’t think they have even tried to establish how many people buy a favourite author’s work in spite of the cover art (a common situation), or who avoid books, because of the covers, that they might actually enjoy. Whether a book is bound in jewel-encrusted, gold-mounted leather or torn old newspapers, it will ultimately be judged and remembered for the words that are printed on the pages inside. If it is a good story, well-written, it transcends its ephemeral outer wrappings, and will continue to do so for decades, and indeed, for centuries.

    Imagine being shown a small box, wrapped in glossy coloured paper, and being asked, ‘Do you like this ring?’ Wouldn’t you say, ‘Well, I’ll tell you if you open it and show me the ring! All I can see is the gift-wrapped box!’ The ring inside might be an exquisite 18-carat creation with rubies and diamonds of the highest quality, or a plastic trinket from a Christmas cracker: how can you tell from the outside?

    Readers, IGNORE the cover-art. Always look inside, and judge on that basis alone. If you allow yourself to be influenced by the cover, you may be buying books you don’t enjoy and missing ones you would love – and you are simply dancing to the marketing men’s tune.

    6:03 AM  
    Blogger Lori Foster said...

    Ranurgis, Suz's "Lucky" cover was out the same time as my "Sawyer" cover. I loved her smiling face sticker to make them better. In fact, I put a bag jpg over Sawyer - and the Hq people were infuriated. I was told to remove it right away!
    I guess that's the difference between NY Hq (for Suz) and Canada Hq (for me.)

    Happy Sunday!
    Lori

    7:25 AM  
    Blogger Suzanne Simmons said...

    One of my editors said: "The cover of a book is more important than it ought to be."

    She's absolutely right. The cover of a book has something like one second to grab a reader's attention.

    To have a title and a cover and a "look" that reinforces the content of a book seems to be the exception, not the rule in publishing. It's just darn hard to pull off. :-)

    9:13 AM  
    Anonymous AgTigress said...

    Suzanne said: 'The cover of a book has something like one second to grab a reader's attention'.

    Sadly, this is all too true, and it works both ways. It can attract the potential purchaser and make her pick a book up, or it can repel her and prevent her from doing so (as each and every category romance repelled me until I was in my 40s, because I was too stupid until then to pick up a book dressed in a cover that I hated).

    Neither of those responses has any relationship to whether the reader might enjoy the actual book.
    Readers need to stop and THINK. In that one second, they must pretend all the books have identical brown-paper covers, blank but for the author's name.

    If we can all learn how to confound and confuse the marketing departments, we shall have done ourselves, many hard-working writers, and society as a whole a great service!

    :-)

    9:34 AM  
    Blogger Karibear said...

    Question for all you who deal with book publishers: Is there a website, ANY website, where readers can provide feedback and/or opinions on cover art?

    11:55 AM  
    Blogger Jen said...

    I think the cover does make a difference. If it has the "Fabio" type of picture on the front, I just pass it on by. Now I loved the covers for Lori's Visitation Series. With that said, the cover is not the deciding factor in whether I buy a book or not. But it will get me to pick the book up and read the blurb on the back. If the blurb sounds good, then more than likely I will buy the book (if it isn't an author I normally buy).

    5:41 PM  
    Anonymous AgTigress said...

    Jen said:
    'If it has the "Fabio" type of picture on the front, I just pass it on by.'

    But how do you know, having passed the book by on account of the 'packaging', that the story inside would not have been good and to your taste? You don't. That is my point.

    I always dislike ALL category romance covers (I have never yet seen one that I actually like). But I have found many books that I liked a lot, with those, to me, repellent covers.

    3:03 AM  
    Blogger wavybrains said...

    Lori--I loved the pink color of the "Unexpected" cover--but it just didn't suit the story. The story was way more RS than a lot of yours and the heroine was just not a "pink" kind of girl. And I thought the girl bent over with the magnifying glass was kinda cheesy. For me, as a reader, the cover has to suit the characters and neither MC in "Unexpected" was whimsical. That same cover might have worked great with different plot/characters. Cover art gives a reader a clue about what to expect and I think the main problem with "bad" covers is not that the art is awful but that there is a disconnect between cover and story. Perhaps the art department needs to read more than the blurb!! :) (Oh and I absolutely loved the story in Unexpected--my beef is with the cover NOT the writing :):))

    10:33 AM  
    Anonymous AgTigress said...

    Wavybrains said: "Cover art gives a reader a clue about what to expect and I think the main problem with "bad" covers is not that the art is awful but that there is a disconnect between cover and story."

    I can't agree. The art frequently IS awful! The design of nearly all category romance covers is still utterly appalling by any reasonably grown-up aesthetic standards. Non-category books, of course, vary enormously as far as cover art is concerned, and there are some clever, balanced and elegant covers amongst them.

    And if a good book is covered in a tacky, tawdry cover, far from giving the reader 'a clue what to expect', it totally misleads her into thinking that the story is as naff as the picture on the front.

    :-)

    12:46 PM  
    Anonymous AgTigress said...

    Sorry - meant to add this: Lori's Too Much Temptation cover is a good example of witty, imaginative and visually pleasing cover art. Unlike some of her early category covers that she illustrates...

    12:50 PM  
    Blogger wavybrains said...

    Agtigress--this is my point too--if a good book is hidden by a bad cover, the reader suffers disconnect. Yes, the book is still wonderful, but the reader has to overcome that initial impression and move forward. Should the reader? Yes. Do most readers? I'm not sure. I do know that as an avid reader, I have to push myself past certain covers, and usually need a little prod to do so--favorite author, cover quote, etc. The cover DOES give a clue/an initial impression--and even if that intial impression is wrong (i.e. "this is a light hearted romantic comedy" or "this is a dated category")--readers do rely on these messages. The answer is covers that more accurately reflect the story within. Oh and more determined readers--but better covers might be the easier sell :P

    3:21 PM  
    Anonymous AgTigress said...

    Yes, I think we are making a similar point. The thing is, it is actually very easy to become 'blind' to cover art - I did it many years ago, with the result that I started reading some category romances, instead of walking past those shelves with a shudder - and once you do that, you find you can make choices far more quickly, easily and accurately. The covers are simply an annoying distraction from the serious business of choosing a book one wants to read.

    Cover art is a different matter for many types of non-fiction books. In an illustrated book on art, archaeology, architecture, travel, landscape etc., the cover often really matters, because it will usually be an illustration from inside the book. Its quality is significant. But a novel is not about visual iconography. What is on the cover of a novel is unimportant and ephemeral, and I wish more readers could learn that.

    :-)

    4:25 PM  
    Blogger Lori Foster said...

    Sorry I disappeared folks. I've been mega busy with extended family stuff, and I had a nasty head cold to boot. Ugh.

    Suzanne, good point. I think part of the problem is that each person has a different perspective of the focus in a book. ::Shrug:::

    Agtigress, I know the "Sawyer" cover didn't need more than a second to repel people. LOL

    Karibear, to my knowledge there isn't a play to give feedback to the art dept. I suppose if readers wrote to publishers when they LOVED a cover, the art dept might hear about it. But I doubt the reverse is true.

    Jen, thank you! I liked the Visitation covers too.

    Agtigress, I think Jen's point is that we can't possibly read ALL the blurbs on ALL the books. Shoot, we'd never get out of the bookstore!

    Wavybrains, thank you. I knew you weren't criticizing the story. I guess the main thing I want from a cover is for it to be appealing. Next I want it to reflect the book, but if it's appealing, I'll take it - especially after having so many UNappealing covers. ;-)

    Ladies, I'm still drawn by a great cover when I'm searching a bookstore. Can't help it. I'm an aesthetic person and the packaging can grab me. :-)

    Hugs to all!

    Lori

    4:37 AM  
    Blogger elizabeth said...

    Lori, I love you like a flower...but I have to tell you cover problems NEVER end!

    If your name is on it, I happily ignore the cover. :-)))

    11:33 AM  

    Post a Comment

    << Home

    Powered by Blogger