Running With Quills, Blogsite for Jayne Ann Krentz, Elizabeth Lowell, Stella Cameron, and Suzanne Simmons
Susan Andersen
Suzanne Simmons



Stella Cameron
Stella Cameron




Lori Foster
Suzanne Simmons



Jayne Ann Krentz
Jayne Ann Krentz




Elizabeth Lowell
Elizabeth Lowell




Suzanne Simmons
Suzanne Simmons











  • Welcome to Running With Quills, your online newsletter designed to keep you up to date with what your favorite authors (that would be us) are doing throughout the year. Here you will find the release dates of our new books and get information about our backlists. We'll preview our cover art here long before the books hit the stores and we'll keep you informed about works-in-progress and special projects. You'll also receive advance notice of signings and appearances. From time to time we'll give you a peek at our worlds, tell you what we're reading, and introduce you to some new authors.

    Thursday, November 09, 2006

    Susan feels like the new kid on the block when it comes to connected books.

    Unlike my Sister Quillers, it used to be that once I’d completed a book I was done with it, you know? Finished with those characters and ready to move on to brand new ones. I loved reading connected stories--I simply had no desire to write them.

    But one day I took a good long look at the market and noticed that many of the most successful writers in our industry were writing books with connected characters. And I made a cold-blooded decision. I was going to try my hand at that as well. And If I wasn't particularly wild about the idea of reusing characters I'd already written-- well, I would just have to suck it up and do it anyhow.

    Then something happened that I hadn't anticipated. I discovered I'd been missing out.

    Oh. My. Gawd. Why had no one ever told me? It must be like the Secret Handshake or something, because this wasn't onerous at all! In fact, there was a huge benefit to writing connected books that had nothing to do with the advancement of one’s career. Not only was this fun, but it improved my comprehension of my characters. Yowsa!




    I'm very much a character driven writer. Yet even so, it takes me a solid five or six chapters of feeling my way through the various personalities before I figure out just who all these people I’m creating are --and often it takes much longer. I've found out, however, that having a hero or heroine who's already made an appearance in another book gives me a big leg up on my understanding of their character. This was first driven home to me in the case of John, the Rocket, Miglionni from my Marines Trilogy. He was a throw-away line, hardly even a mention in Head Over Heels. In Getting Lucky he had an actual role and began to become real to me. By the time I got to his story in Hot & Bothered, I knew this guy inside out. It was so kewl that I immediately dove into another duo of connected books about Vegas showgirls.

    And it happened again. I had to kind of tiptoe my way through the beginning of Skintight, but I really knew Carly Jacobsen (the best friend of Tight’s heroine) by the time I wrote Just For Kicks. And the fastest book I've ever written in my life (which ok, ok, isn't that fast compared to most writers I know, but still) is my upcoming Coming Undone, which is PJ and Jared's story. They were a couple of kids living on the streets of Denver in Hot & Bothered and those two simply would not leave me alone until I aged them 15 years and wrote their story.


    So, as you can see, I’m a convert. I’ve discovered the wonders of writing connected stories, and I ain’t ever going back!

    But what do YOU all love (or maybe hate) about these connected books? What pleases you most? What do you like the least? Who first sucked you in? Are there things connecting the characters that you like better than others? And do you find the characters more fully realized in subsequent stories. . . or is that a phenomenon realized only by me?

    40 Comments:

    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    The first series I read were childrens books. Some Icelandic ones but also translated from English. Books like Lassie, The Black Stallion, Frank and Joe, Nancy Drew, Beverly Gray and Rosa Bennet. These were just some of my favorites.
    Later I advanced to more romantically inclined books and and I discovered a whole new world out there waiting for me. Kay Hooper was the author of the first series I read, the Hagen series. I loved her carachters, Joshua Long and his wife Raven and all the sexy and brave men and women who were connected with them.

    The next author whose series I read was Jayne Ann Krentz, when I got my hands on The Pirate and later on The Cowboy. However, it took at least a decade before I finally got my hands on The Adventurer.

    From that point on there´s been no looking back. Now I read series and non-series from a wide variety of authors. Everything, in fact, from Agatha Cristie to Elizabeth Lowell and J.K. Rowling to name but a few.
    Sirry.

    12:25 AM  
    Blogger DFender said...

    Susan,

    I'm sure I've mentioned it before but I love to go back and "visit" my friends from a series of books.

    I'm pleased when the characters that I'm visiting seem to be well. You know, more of that "happy ending" kinda feeling - in the middle of another book :-)

    Robert B. Parker and his Spenser series first sucked me in. After that it was Clive Cussler. Catherine Coulter was the first romance author that got me hooked on the series-thing. I still read Parkker, Cussler and Coulter, too. I love 'em.

    I enjoy when characters are connected by a business-type relationship (like Jayne's Arcane Society, for example)or family the most.

    The characters always, always develop more fully for me. I love learning who's had babies, who's doing what career-wise, etc. As I said, it's nice to be reminded that the other character's couples remain firmly in love and safe :-)

    Happy Friday, Susan!!

    Deb

    3:33 AM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    Reading books that are connected is great. I love reading snippets about characters from the previous book in the new books. You get a little insight on what they have been up too since you last read about them. It makes them almost seem like real people.

    My first series author was I believe Suzanne Brockmann. But I have also read Julie Garwood and Carly Phillips, Linda Francis Lee & Roxanne St. Claire series.

    Kelly F.

    5:20 AM  
    Anonymous Carrie from Wisconsin said...

    "But what do YOU all love (or maybe hate) about these connected books? What pleases you most? What do you like the least? Who first sucked you in? Are there things connecting the characters that you like better than others? And do you find the characters more fully realized in subsequent stories. . . or is that a phenomenon realized only by me?"

    Susan,

    Forgive me, but I am new to the romance world and Jayne's Amanda Quick (AQ) novels dipped my feet in. This site is helping me to jump into the worldpool. I am not new to writing, as I almost have my degree in Professional & Technical Writing and I consider myself a writer even though I have yet to publish anything.

    I like connected books for a number of reasons.

    For one it provides a sense of time, or chronology, especially in period novels such as Jayne's AQ novels. Even though the date isn't stated specfically (not that I can remember anyway), I'm still left with a sense of time by not only the environment the characters exist in, but the existence of the extraneous, or side, characters. Age, or sets of events, of a side character of one book help to say whether that particular novel happens before or after the novel they "star" in. This time element helps to reinforce the existence of the "world" created for these characters. For example, it would have been hard to believe if the many London characters from Jayne's AQ novels that existed in the same level of society, a similar timeframe and attended the same events not to have crossed paths at some point in time.

    Besides this chronological aspect, having these characters cross, even for just a moment, can create a world beyond that which the author intended. It helps to make the characters more solid, real, maybe even "friends" as dfender has said on more than one occassion.

    Not only does it provide time and solidity, but the reader gets to "see" the character, even a favorite, from...well...another person's point of view that seems different from the perspective of the book in which they are the main character. This new viewpoint can often de-loftify, or bring to reality, the character. I don't know about other readers, but I tend to raise a charcter up a little above the rest and when I see a different take on them, that position tends to change. If a character is awkward, that may not come out as strongly when they are the main character then it does when a different character glimpses them in another book. Emily Farringdon in AQ's "Scandal" is an excellent example. In this book her unkempt appearance seems almost purposeful and in some cases, fashionable. In another book (forget the name here), there is more a sense of frazzled disarray for Emily and not necessarily very becoming. Again, the point of view adds depth and realism that may not have been achieved otherwise.

    I like connectedness of characters because it makes it fun to find out who the main characters run into, if I'm going to know/like them, find myself at a familiar event or place or get a sense of time passage whether days, weeks or years.

    The only thing that might be a downer is if character builing is redundant between two novels. It's one thing for a light description to jog the memory and quite another to introduce the character all over again. Sometimes the mystery of a side character that turns up in another book is what leads me to read it in the first place.

    As for who sucked me in, that would have to be "The Black Stallion" series. When I finished "The Black Stallion" and realized that the other novels written by Walter Farley were about the same horse and had the same characters, I was hooked. I liked Alec and the personality of the horse made me dream of being a jockey. Growing up in a big suburb of a big city, miles away from anything horses, made that dream an impossible one.

    Carrie

    5:28 AM  
    Blogger farmwifetwo said...

    I HATE connected books where the timeline is all screwed up. If you are going to use reoccuring characters pick ages, how long the series is going to run for and sort it out in advance.

    I'm one that will check up on it and it's enough to have me stop reading a series.

    I started long ago with Anne of Green Gables and Laura Ingalls Wilder.

    5:48 AM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    I enjoy connected books as a chance to see more into the HEA that we got with the previous book, as well as the chance to finish a story that was started with secondary characters in previous books (such as Jared and PJ--SO excited to be getting their story). I enjoy connected books more than "series" where the same character is the main character with each book. I enjoy the HEA at the end of a book.

    For your books, Susan, Rocket's book was the first book I read of yours, without realizing it was a connected book. He sucked me right in. When I was done, I researched your backlist and read the first two in the series. And then I read everything else you wrote. I loved the Showgirl series, and do find that with each book all the characters are more fleshed out. As I said before, I'm looking very forward to Jared and PJ's story.

    6:15 AM  
    Anonymous Carrie from Wisconsin said...

    I guess I have to agree with farmwifetwo about a messed-up timeline. I stopped paying attention to a soap when the writers completely messed up the ages of the children to suit their own character needs. It did tick me off. I just haven't encountered problems like that in books, yet.

    Jayne has done the timelines of AQ in such a way that the timeline didn't appear to be out of order in anyway.

    Carrie

    6:19 AM  
    Blogger Cbell said...

    The thing I would LOVE about connected books, is if there was a blurb on the cover, or right inside that says "Book 1 of a series" or something to that effect. What is difficult is to pick up a book and get halfway through it only to find out that it is the 3rd or 4th book in a series. I'd like to be able to start the series from the beginning and work my way chronologically.

    7:33 AM  
    Blogger Suzanne Simmons said...

    Susan,

    I, too, started getting hooked on series with Nancy Drew and the Black Stallion books. I liked what someone here said about a "happy ending kind of feeling in the middle of a book."

    If I discover a new series on book 3 or 4 or even 13 or 14, I will go back and read everything in that series from the first book. It's like finding buried treasure!

    Happy Friday all!

    7:56 AM  
    Anonymous Carrie from Wisconsin said...

    Question for general comment:

    Connected books don't always have to be a direct series, do they?

    In the other genres I read, Sci-Fi/Fantasy, volumes are always identified and not knowing the chronology has never been an issue.

    I guess when I think of the term connected I mean that there are some unifying themes (Arcane Society), places (London Society), issues (Antiquities) and/or characters (Emily Farringdon, Tobias March, Colhester [Mentioned in one of the Lake/March novels as a connection to Joan Dove]).

    I use the term series to denote an actual chronological sequence of books such as Tad Williams' "Otherland", R.A. Salvatore's Drizzt Do'urden novels or AQ's "Slightly Shady", "Don't Look Back" and "Late for the Wedding" which have identifiers in the blurb on the back and I believe on the front of the book somewhere.

    Does anyone else share my definitions of "connected" and "series" in the same manner? After reading some of the other posts, I'm curious.

    Carrie

    8:09 AM  
    Anonymous Lynne said...

    What I like about series and connected books: a chance to reconnect with characters I've enjoyed and peek into how their lives have developed, when their appearance contributes to the story. Feeling part of a bigger group that's just beyond the corner as it were.

    What I don't like: authors inserting every character from the previous books in a series into every new story, without there being some purpose to it. I mean, if they're all at the wedding, that's great (think Jayne's Flower series where Orchid's wedding scene had both Zinnia and Amaryllis and their new husbands, raising a glass in toast) but if they're just dragged in so the author can hammer home the point that this is a series, forget it.

    Also don't like pages and pages re-hashing the previous stories. If I've read the stories that come before, I know all this and if I haven't but like this story enough or am intrigued enough by a casual mention, I'll go to the trouble to find the backstory. I'm just now reading a story DREAMING OF YOU by Francis Ray that handles this beautifully. Two brothers of Brandon Grayson had their stories before this, plus a cousin and several assorted other persons. Their difficulties are casually introduced, almost as throwaway comments, and in a way that piqued my interest, so now I've ordered them to read. And I'll read the upcoming ones as well, because she's done such a great job of setting up the atmosphere and family without beating me over the head with it.

    hope that helps,
    Lynne

    8:31 AM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    I love connected books and characters, but their book have to be able to read as stand alones also. If I accidentally stumble upon a book which has a connecting character, I want to get to know the character through the book and not feel like I've been dropped into the middle of the story.

    9:41 AM  
    Blogger Jayne Ann Krentz said...

    Loved the insight about getting to know your characters better by sneaking up on them when they're still side characters! Great blog, Susan!

    --Jayne

    10:01 AM  
    Blogger Karibear said...

    I sort of agree with all the comments re series and connected books. To me, a series has mostly the same characters, or at least follows the various characters from previous books. Connected books, to me, are more connected by setting than character.

    For example, for series think Tanenbaum's Karp family - begins with Butch and Marlene first meeting, then follows the development of their family thru the birth of their daughter and later the twins. They weren't all written in chronological order, but all important bases were covered eventually, right down to how they acquired the first mastiff.

    For connected stories, think Norton's Witch World, or Lackey's Valdemar, or McCaffrey's Pern. A lot of the characters do reappear or are mentioned, but they aren't necessary to the actual story. It's the place that's the connection.

    And they ALL suck me in, if the writing is good. I don't necessarily look for a series or connected books, but for authors I like. If a book I like turns out to be part of a series, so much the better - then I have the fun of searching for the rest.

    11:27 AM  
    Blogger Susan Andersen said...

    I didn't have series in mind when I started this subject, but you all have made me think. I believe my first series was probably John D MacDonald's Travis McGee books. I still remember his "coppery taste of blood". Or, no, no, that was as a teenager. Nancy Drew,Sue Barton and Agatha Christie's series were before that. Nowadays I'm stuck on Suzanne Brockmann's Navy Seals, Nancy Martin's Blackbird Sisters, JD Robb's Eve and Roarke and all of Charlaine Harris's series from Sookie Stackhouse to The Shakespeare books.

    I'm trying to think which romance writer's connected books I first read and I think maybe it was Johanna Lindsay. It wasn't until much later, however, that I got caught up in the gotta-have-I'm-totally-sucked-into-these- connected-books fever though.

    11:39 AM  
    Blogger Susan Andersen said...

    Carrie from Wisconsin, welcome to the bright side. It's NEVER a bad time to discover Romance.

    Deb, I always look forward to your "Happy Fridays". Thank you.

    Anonymous, you can't just say nice things about my books like that and then not identify yourself!!! Sign your name, girl! (Or guy. I guess I shouldn't gender brand)

    Kari, I buy by author as well. Occasionally I might not buy into his/her worldview for a particular book, but mostly I know I'm going to get a book I'll really enjoy.

    Suzanne, I've gone back as well to buy the books preceding the one that introduced me to a series or character connected group of books. I've been pretty lucky, though, in that I've mostly discovered them fairly early--or have been introduced to them by someone else who lent me the first couple. For example, when The fourth Harry Potter book was hitting the stores and kids were at the stores at midnight to buy it, I wanted to know what all the fuss was about. So I borrowed the first in the series from my best friend's son. It totally sucked me in and I immediately went out and bought the rest and continlue to look forward to each new one. (only, what, one left now?)

    12:10 PM  
    Blogger Stella said...

    This may horrify a few but my first "series" was NODDY by Enid Blyton! I had my Noddy doll to keep me company while I turned the pages of each new book. Yes, I was very young.

    Moved on to a series about a little mouse, a girl mouse who, in retrospect, bore a startling resemblance to Cinderella!

    Enid Blyton's FAMOUS FIVE, ADVENTURES,MAGIC FARAWAY TREE--well, Ms Blyton wrote a lot and fortunately I was a little mature for the many books that subsequently came out under her name. The latter after her death.

    Mazo de la Roche's WHITEOAKS were my first foray into an adult series--that was around age 10.

    I've been hunting and reading series ever since. Every Quill has entertained me for years. And so have so many other authors in various genres.

    Harry Potter, er, JK Rowlings, you got me, too. I just bagged a signed copy of UNDER ORDERS, Dick Francis's latest book, from Seattle Mystery (you can find their link on most of our sites)and can hardly wait to visit with Sid Halley again.

    Have you tried Donna Leone? Wonderful Italian mysteries with a cop you've got to follow around from book to book. And, no, they aren't written in Italian!

    Susan, thank you for an excellent blog with evocative questions. You may have held out on writing series but you've certainly established yourself in the field with a bang!

    Why do I write series? Because I love to develop characters. And it's special to go back to settings so familiar, I can walk the streets and follow the bayou in my head.

    Stella

    12:33 PM  
    Blogger Susan Andersen said...

    Oooh, Stella, yes! I've got Under Orders, too! It's not signed and I haven't read it yet, but it's in my stack. One of my favorite Sid Halley books was Whip Hand. (At least I think that was its name) Where he had injured one hand and the bad guy threatened to permanently disable it and/or the other one. Francis is masterful at self-effacing, flawed and sometimes frightened heroes who quietly manage to get the job done depite all obstacles. I find competency sooo sexy.

    12:47 PM  
    Blogger Stella said...

    Susan, Yes, Whip Hand was the book and some of those scenes have never left me. He has such skill with suspense. And ditto on the flawed hero--so much less predictable.

    Cheers, Stella

    12:57 PM  
    Blogger Joyce said...

    Love connected stories. I have probably been reading connected stories since childhood. I remember reading about West Point. Each year was a separate book etc. Currently I would have to say Suz Brockmann.

    2:20 PM  
    Blogger Christie Ridgway said...

    Oh, love the series books and I think it probably started with the Little House books for me, too. It's a chance to seep ourselves in a particular world. That's why I read fiction!

    Susan: PJ and Jared! Yeah! That's going to be great.

    3:21 PM  
    Anonymous Louis said...

    Love connected books...The first that I remember were by Robert W Chambers, a 1930s writer, three or four connected stories about the revolutionary war. Zane Grey had one or two short series that I liked.

    I've been showing my age with the above.

    Susan...love your stories ...connected or otherwise. I like most of the previously mentioned authors and series.

    Please keep on writing, all the Quills.

    4:26 PM  
    Blogger Susan Andersen said...

    Christie, as I recall one of your boys (Or maybe both) were big Harry Potter fans during that 4th book bruhaha, am I right? I seem to remember you posting about it on the Avon loop at the time.

    And Louis, right there with ya on the showing our age thing. Except if you were actually around for the Chambers books when they first came out, you definitely have me beat. Gotta love that. :)

    5:13 PM  
    Blogger Karibear said...

    Chambers I don't know, but I had access to an uncle's book remains, so I got lots of Tom Swift, Don Sturdy, Edgar Rice Burroughs, a truly ancient [but complete] Book of Knowlege [about 20 volumes], and many others. Plus, we shopped at a local Goodwill, where they had books starting at .05. My mother would give me a quarter to keep me occupied, and I spent hours debating whether to get 5 'cheap' books, or one 'interesting' book. Amazing how interesting those cheap ones got! Oh, and the Tom Swifts and the ERBs were originals, not reprints.

    6:30 PM  
    Anonymous Deborah said...

    Sorry, Susan. I can't seem to remember my password here, so I used anonymous so I could post a response. I really wanted you to know how much I love all your books, connected and otherwise. I have also turned many friends on to your books, and made more fans, I'm proud to say. Thanks for such wonderful stories, characters and humor. Again, looking forward to Jared and PJ's story.

    10:27 AM  
    Blogger Susan Andersen said...

    Deborah, thank YOU. You are my kinda reader! Actually, you're every writer's dream reader. ~Susan

    2:08 PM  
    Blogger Judy F said...

    I am so excited that you are going to write Pj and Jared's story. Got a release date???

    I love connected stories. Its like revisting friends and family you don't get to see that often. After a few pages it all comes back to you.

    I just love your connected stories.Skin Tight was a treat.

    7:23 PM  
    Blogger Susan Andersen said...

    Judy, thank you! Coming Undone (PJ & Jared's story) will be out next September.

    11:53 PM  
    Anonymous dani said...

    if you were stranded on a desert island which character would you pick most useful?

    12:20 AM  
    Anonymous AgTigress said...

    Am I the only person who is unable to see any of the pictures that Susan has posted in this blog? I just get a frame with that maddening little red x in the corner.

    11:00 AM  
    Blogger Karibear said...

    I can't see them either, but my computer is very arbitrary about what it lets me see. Some things yes, some things, no. Sometimes I get them after reloading, sometimes I never get them. The HTML and graphics Beings hate me.

    1:31 PM  
    Anonymous AgTigress said...

    Well, usually I can see them, so I wondered why the pics in this particular blog were not visible.
    Perhaps the computer-omniscient Cissy should be consulted.
    ;-) :-)

    2:36 PM  
    Anonymous Carrie from Wisconsin said...

    It's possible that they are being blocked by a pop-up blocker, or that your system requirements are unable to display the visual format of the images.

    11:27 PM  
    Blogger Stella said...

    Unfortunately I can't see Susan's pictures, either. We'll have to see what we can do to deal with the glitch.

    Stella

    11:31 PM  
    Anonymous AgTigress said...

    No, it isn't a pop-up blocker in my case. And my system deals okay with the most usual image formats: as I said, I have always been able to see other pictures posted on this site, and can see all of them at the moment except those in Susan's blog.

    2:14 AM  
    Anonymous Lou said...

    I'm on my computer at work at a high-tech data center and I can't see the pictures either. Blogger is sulking or something.

    I believe it was Carrie from Wisconsin that brought up the subject of "series" vs. "connected". To me, "series" is about one or two main characters who are featured in every book (like the JD Robb series or the Black Stallion series). I see "connected" as books that are linked by characters that have been mentioned in previous books like Elizabeth Lowell's Donovan books. Each book features the adventures of a Donovan sibling but can also be a stand-alone book.

    Susan's Marine books and show-girl books are connected by characters that have deep friendships or family connections, but can also be stand-alone books. (I have all your books, BTW, Susan. Love them all!!)

    I love connected books because as it has been said before, previous characters can be revisited. Can't wait for PJ and Jared's story!!

    10:19 AM  
    Blogger Susan Andersen said...

    I refreshed my page and now I can't see them either. Sigh. Usually I run all my pics through photobucket and then they show up. But I was doing my covers this time and they kept coming up all blurry through photoB so I simply put them in as images from my pics file.

    Obviously that didn't work.

    Thanks, Lou. I'm really excited about PJ and Jared's book, too. I've never had a character grab hold of my imagination quite as firmly as Pricilla Jayne did--both in H&B and Coming Undone.

    Deni, re: the which character I'd find most useful on a desert island I'd have to say any of my Marines, since they've all been trained in survivorlist techniques. :)

    11:44 AM  
    Anonymous Carrie from Wisconsin said...

    In regards to the images. The way you describe your pictures, again I am brought back to the idea of a pop-up blocker because that's what all of my blocked, or closed, pop-ups look like. Have you tried to open the images?

    Another issue, for the high-tech, could be from firewall protection.

    If the other issues are not the case, I think I have figured out the issue. I looked at Stella's, Christie's, Susan's, Jayne's and Suzanne's. If I am right, it could be the file type. Stella's, Christie's and Jayne's are .jpeg files while Suzanne's and Susan's are .gif, so, for those of you having difficulty viewing those two images, file type is probably the problem.

    For those who are at work and cannot view any of the pics, it could be that your company has it set so that only company related or company acceptable images can be viewed. You may have to talk to your company's tech to see if the issue can be corrected.

    Check out these things and if you still have trouble, let me know.

    Carrie

    7:51 PM  
    Blogger MamaBee82 said...

    I love connected books, series, trilogy's. Your so absorbed into the main characters, that you only get a peek at maybe a few others. That peek is enough to ask, "what would happen if?.." and then that question is answered by the next book! I was so looking forward to Katie MacAllister's next book in her Guardian novels, I dragged my poor kids all the way to Barnes and Noble just to purchase a seven dollar paper back..

    11:03 AM  
    Anonymous Linda Ireland said...

    I usually enjoy reading series or related books, but I get frustrated that it's so hard to find out information about them. I wish you would post on your website (better yet if Amazon.com, and the other on-line booksellers would do it, too) information like:

    Author, Title, Genre, Series Name, Sequence# within the series, Year of publication.

    Sometimes a friend recommends an author to me, and I'd like to try them, but I don't know where to start. My preference is to read a series in the order the author intended (usually in the order they were published, but not always). That way, I don't find myself "missing" information about other characters, I'm "in the know." It's slightly less enjoyable to go back and read about Adam's pursuit of Eve when we already know about how that came out from seeing them at Sarah and Abraham's wedding. OK, bad example, too much time lapse there, but you catch my drift.

    I'm sure it's true, in this genre, that when we get to paragraph 2 of Genesis, we already know that Adam's gonna get the girl, but still, that's the whole point, isn't it? If we weren't enjoying the chase, we wouldn't be reading the boy gets girl genre at all.

    So I'm glad this particular blog clears up this issue for these 5 of your books, but I had to do some digging to find this page. I think it would be great to see you post this info on your main book page. Also, I'd like to know if all of your books are romance, since some of the titles appear to be thrillers instead. If you're an author who writes multiple genres, I might get hooked on your romances, and then want to try one of your thriller/murder mysteries, or vice-versa, but not everybody will want to do that, they might prefer to stick to one genre only. Also, books can be expensive for the seriously addicted. If I were hooked, I would be more likely to rush out and buy all of your romances, and then maybe pick up the thrillers at a used bookstore, etc.

    And I HATE hard bound books. When I want to read an author that is publishing hard bound, I don't begrudge them the extra money, but I can't stand holding up those heavy books for hours while I read. Maybe it's a function of leftover carpal tunnel syndrome, or early-onset arthritis, but my hands and wrists start to ache from holding them up, so it takes much of the pleasure out of reading. (Whoops! Pet peeve unrelated to the current discussion!)

    Anyway, thanks for listening! I just read Head Over Heels (was that modeled on Puyallup? I know it was "east" of the mountains, but Fossil sounded like it had the Puyallup fair.) I also enjoy the extra fun of a known location, too. Looking for more, keep up the good work!

    5:33 PM  

    Post a Comment

    << Home

    Powered by Blogger