Running With Quills, Blogsite for Jayne Ann Krentz, Elizabeth Lowell, Stella Cameron, and Suzanne Simmons
Susan Andersen
Suzanne Simmons



Stella Cameron
Stella Cameron




Lori Foster
Suzanne Simmons



Jayne Ann Krentz
Jayne Ann Krentz




Elizabeth Lowell
Elizabeth Lowell




Suzanne Simmons
Suzanne Simmons






Welcome to Running With Quills, your online newsletter designed to keep you up to date with what your favorite authors (that would be us) are doing throughout the year. Here you will find the release dates of our new books and get information about our backlists. We'll preview our cover art here long before the books hit the stores and we'll keep you informed about works-in-progress and special projects. You'll also receive advance notice of signings and appearances. From time to time we'll give you a peek at our worlds, tell you what we're reading, and introduce you to some new authors.

Thursday, June 14, 2007

If I hear Paris Hilton's name one more time... a rant, by Susan


Remember when news actually used to be about what was going on in the world or in your city? When Uncle Walter said, "And that's the way it is," and you felt that WAS the way it was? Then O.J. Simpson crept down a Los Angeles freeway and overnight, it seemed, everything changed. Top Story became Top Speculation.

And now we have Hollywood gossip dominating the news. What the heck is that all about? I find it hard to believe that I'm the only one who could give a flying fig what Paris Hilton and others of her ilk are doing. Yet you can't seem to pick up a magazine or turn on a television without encountering a story about them. When did vacant-eyed young women whose only claim to fame is drunken partying and/or narcissistic exhibitionism become the main story on the six o'clock news? How has it managed to overtake in-depth reporting on matters of actual importance?

Or maybe I should just take a deep breath. Okay, doing that here.
Still, I have to admit it feels good to get that little rant off my chest.

Anything you'd care to get off yours?

35 Comments:

Blogger karende said...

I always thought news was supposed to be Who, What, When, Where, How - not necessarily in that order, but still all facts. When on earth did the 'how do you feel about...' suddenly show up? If it's a victim or a family member of a victim, how does anyone with half a brain THINK they'd feel?

Speculation in political reporting is another thing entirely, there doesn't ever seem to be anything cut and dried about politics, not with the current gaggle of spin doctors saying 'yes' really means 'no' and trying to explain things so people will believe it. And they'll try to convince you the sun really rises in the west, too.

I don't mind the focus on celebrities and their foibles, as lng as it's made clear it's all entertainment and not real news. I DO mind being told it's NEWS. A tornado that wipes out a town is news, a hurricane that leaves untold disaster behind is news. A plane crash is news. The events of 9/11 and it's aftermath were news. At least up to the point where the survivors started squabbling about who was going to get more $$ because THEIR spouse was more important that someone else's.

And all the news stories about how wonderful and superior the US system of [insert whatever here] is compared to the rest of the world, side by side with stories about new discoveries in the rest of the world, or the higher levels of educational attainment in other parts of the world, gall me.

I got irritated by the people who criticized Oprah for spending money on a school in Africa. They said there were kids at home who needed education. I don't know why those critics don't think they shouldn't do a little contributing and encouraging, if the kids at home need it so badly. Besides, it's HER money, she earned it and she has every right to spend it any way she wants. Just like any other person with a lot of $$,

And another rant I have is the widening gap between the so-called upper and lower class. The middle class seems to be vanishing into the sunset, and it doesn't seem to have any real relationship to educational level or employment. As far as I've been able to see, the poor of the lower class work a lot harder than the upper class, the real upper class with old family money, like the Hiltons and their ilk.

I could go on, but I won't. More of my soapboxes.

karibear

12:03 AM  
Blogger DFender said...

Susan! I agree! As for my ranting subjects, well...

Horrible Drivers, we all had to pass the same damn test, right??

Drunk Drivers, c'mon! Ugh.

Crappy Parents, why do they have kids at all then?

People who abandon animals, truly scumbags.

The Media (all encompassing), who are you to say what I should think?

...and the less "big picture" topics... dirty sinks, messy desks, unmade beds... lolol. Sheesh!

That actually felt pretty good and I didn't even expand my ranting! LOL

Happy FRIDAY!!!!

Deb

3:23 AM  
Anonymous Lori of Canada said...

I definitely concur - but for me, the pinnacle was Anna Nicole Smith. Yes, it is tragic for someone to die young however to be on "Headline News" for 8 hours straight??? And to have it make the top news story on the news channels??? And then to have the legal battle over her remains be broadcast entirely? What happened to allowing someone dignity after they die? What does that say about what our culture holds important??

My other rant is the way in which youth are portrayed in the media,and I Think this ties into Paris Hilton. The perception of youth is that they are violent, wasteful, spoiled, etc, be that with celebrities or the youth features on any everyday broadcast.

Last month, I was the staff advisor for a thurd annual male pageant at my school (it is a spoof on regular pageants; I sent Lori F. some pics of it last year.). It is amazing and the students raise money for safe prom activities. WHat is so amazing is that each year, I find myself having to do less and less when it comes to organizing. Why? Because the students take charge, responsibility and ownership of the event. When they called me on stage at the end of the night, I asked for the mike and spoke to the audience. I said that "we are constantly reminded of what is wrong with the youth of today. The next time you hear that, I want to remind you that tonight, and for the last two years, you have seen what is right."

Why must we expend so much energy on point out examples of what not to do, gleefully enjoying someone's foibles, flaws and tragedies, with no thought to what is right to do??

Lori M, who is heading off to teach for the rest of the day!

3:35 AM  
Blogger Lori Foster said...

Oh Karibear.... we could duke it out in such a massive political debate here! LOL. But this is Susan's blog, so I won't touch your post.

Susan, I think it's a generation gap. I really do. It irks me too, but while you and I (and most people over 30) don't give a fig what Paris does, the younger generation is all agog with celebrity news and attempts to duplicate the famous. It's so sad.

I had a friend tell me that her son was haywire because he was "trying to find himself." Huh. I told her at his age, I was too busy surviving to worry about that stuff, and it's true. If you pay attention to you, meet your responsibilities, and care for your loved ones, everything else falls into place.
Whether Paris is on the news or not.
LOL

Great blog!

Lori

5:01 AM  
Blogger Jayne Ann Krentz said...

I'm with you, Susan. Who cares about Paris. But here's the thing, as a species we are fascinated by scandal and sensation. Folks were just as wild about this kind of stuff in the 18th and 19th century. Sex was always popular -- sex with murder was even more popular. The only thing that has changed is the increased speed of communication. Instead of waiting for the next edition of the newspaper or a "penny dreadful" we get the "news" 24/7 all over the place.

What's more, turns out people in all cultures love gossip and scandal.

For what it's worth, I read an interesting article the other day that claims our fascination with this kind of stuff is that it serves as a way of bonding. We may rant about Paris Hilton but we all know who she is and we all have an opinion -- that forms an instant bond, even between strangers.

I dunno. Made sense to me. Maybe you had to be there...

--Jayne

6:38 AM  
Blogger karende said...

Lori:

I'm really not into politics, but I did live for 3 decades in a state that [a] voted in favor of moving the state capitol roughly the distance from Atlanta to Nashville but voted against funding the move; and [b] seriously had a state-wide movement to secede from the rest of the US in the '70s.

Secession is no longer an issue [though the Alaska Passport is still being sold to tourists], but they're still fighting about the capitol move.

What can I say?

karibear

7:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe talking about Paris is like talking about the weather - just something to talk about. Personally I don't really care about the latest goings on in Heather, Brittany, Angelina, Nicole, or Paris' life but it sells magazines and keeps people employed. anon

8:54 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Okay, we were in Italy when poor little Paris was released AND sent back to jail. We were 1/2 a world away. Literally. And on the only English channel, what does the European desk CNN news broadcast? Cameras trained on the Hilton mansion for hours until she was brought out in handcuffs.

I mean was there truly NOTHING else going on in the world more important than that? We came in from sight-seeing, flicked on the news while we changed & it was there. Went to dinner. Came back, same thing. The only thing that came close in the news was the guy trying to jump on the Pope-mobile the day before.

People. Get a life! Show me some NEWS. It used to be the only thing I'd watch on TV is occasional news Now I don't even watch that!! TV has pretty much lost my interest entirely. In catering to the younger generation, the news stations are losing their biggest audience - those over 35. They should look at the demographics again.

KathyLynn

9:29 AM  
Blogger Pia said...

Susan,

I too do not care about Paris Hilton..Why are all the younger celebrities always in the news? Well, why do they do things that would constantly put them there? A few months back it was Brittney Spears and her missing undies or shaving her head (the clippers that was used was even up for auction for $500,000), a few weeks ago it was Lindsay Lohan for driving under the influence (to think that she just turned 20 or 21) and not to mention Paris' friend Nicole Richie who was also caught driving under the influence of alcohol and vicodin...Are these really the kind of lives they want to show their younger fans..It's just sad for those who look up to them.
Also, I recently saw on tv a documentary type of feature about "internet horrors", I did not even think it was that bad! They showed those cyber bullying, sucide blogs, identity theft, online gambling and online predators...Mostly this affect the youth of today and I was stunned at the fact that the parents of some of the victims did not know what was going on with their children until it was too late!

Pia

9:48 AM  
Anonymous sq said...

I think celebrity news should be kept in it's own lil' hole. If I want to know what's going on in the lives of Paris, L.Lo, or Britney, I'll watch E! News or buy a copy of UsWeekly.

Legit news agencies, what is up with that?! Whatever happened to integrity? It's b/c too many news agencies are being run like corporations and the big picture is on the #s not the news. B/c reporting on the civil wars in Africa aren't sexy. Nor is reporting on the unrest in the Middle East. Even though THAT is news. Sadly, I watch The Daily Show w/Jon Stewart for news updates more than CNN b/c CNN has lost all credibility. Seriously, 24/7 coverage of the death of Anna Nicole Smith? REALLY?! While hundreds are dying in Iraq, there's unrest on the Gaza strip, and Hammas is duking it out for control of Palestine w/Fatah, you're reporting on the death of a blonde golddigger? For shame!

12:25 PM  
Blogger Steve, Mae & Nic said...

Amen!!!!!!!!!!!

12:59 PM  
Blogger Elizabeth Guest said...

Paris who?

lolololololololol

Seriously, I get my news from reading a combination of newspapers, watching "Nightline," Charlie Rose, and Jim Lehrer. (Sadly CNN just isn't what it used to be.)

I thought Jayne's comments were fascinating. I have one or two celebs I find mildly intriguing--that's what the E Channel is for. :-)

Happy weekend all!
~EG

1:40 PM  
Blogger susan andersen said...

I like People magazine. I know, I know, it's celebrity hype, but I enjoy it. I agree with your take, SQ, as my beef is not with the ET/Access Hollywood/E! type programs, as the viewer has the option of whether they want to turn it on or not. What gripes me is a supposedly legit news program that inundates us with the latest celebrity foible but doesn't bother to mention anything about Darfur.

1:46 PM  
Blogger susan andersen said...

Deb, want to hear my husband's Assholes or Idiots theory of driving?

According to him, it's all relative. So anyone driving faster than him is an asshole. Anyone driving slower is an idiot.

It's kind of like buses. I'm a public transportation kind of person. Love subway systems (in other cities since here in Seattle our only subway is a half mile stretch at SeaTac airport). I generally take the bus when I go downtown. When I ride them I think the drivers who won't let the bus pull back into traffic from the stops are idiots. But as a driver, I'd just as soon be in front of that bus

Ah, well.

1:55 PM  
Blogger susan andersen said...

Lori of Canada, I hear you on Anna Nicole Smith. The instant "news" on her popped up, I hit the channel changer or just plain turned it off.

I think one of the things that bothers me most about all this, is how the news seems to legitimize what so many of the young celebs are doing. And what kind of message does that send to our underage kids?

At the same time, I don't believe it's television's job to teach our youth right from wrong. But it would nice if they didn't hinder a parent's attempts to teach accountability. :)

2:01 PM  
Blogger elizabeth said...

I suspect the quality of the "news" owes a lot to the fact that there's not enough news to fill the tube 24/7.

As for print media...ever noticed how little seems to happen on Sunday?

The scary thing is that people actually believe what they see/hear/read is true.

*shudders*

3:09 PM  
Blogger elizabeth said...

Susan--forgot to add that my husband attended the same driving school as yours.

*snork!*

3:10 PM  
Blogger susan andersen said...

Jayne, you have a valid point. And I know that I'm idealizing the "old" news to some extent. The Soulmate, who's a ('69-70) VietNam vet, read in the Stars and Stripes paper that the US hadn't invaded Cambodia, while sitting 3 miles over its border. (We at home heard the same thing on the news) And until Clinton, presidents' sex lives were pretty much off-limits to the media. Which, okay, they should be anyhow.

I'm looking for an ideal world.
Snort. That's gonna happen.

3:10 PM  
Blogger Judy F said...

I am with you on the Paris Hilton stuff. I look at the magazines at the bookstore, one will have Nicole Richie with the bump and another will say she is too thin. I think A lot of it is a product of the times. Sometimes I think bad new about celebs sells, you very seldom here about young celebs doing good.

I do read Us Magazine but sometimes I just skim it.

4:30 PM  
Blogger Nell said...

My peeve - calling sports figures "heros". I respect how hard they have worked to use their talent but they are getting PAID to play a GAME!!!

It's used way too loosely. When I think "hero" I think of people who quietly stepped up to the plate during difficult times and did what needed to be done with no thought of personal gain.

5:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I quit watching the news (including local) many years ago because it never seemed relevant.

TinaF

6:08 PM  
Blogger Jayne Ann Krentz said...

This post has been removed by the author.

7:56 PM  
Blogger Jayne Ann Krentz said...

This post has been removed by the author.

8:02 PM  
Blogger Jayne Ann Krentz said...

Trust me, it is better that you don't know why I deleted those two posts. Lesson learned here: Never comment on the blog after a couple of glasses of wine.

-Jayne

8:13 PM  
Blogger susan andersen said...

Which you understand, of course, just really really whets our appetite to know WHAT Jayne writes after a coupla glasses of wine. *g*

10:42 PM  
Anonymous Ranurgis said...

I know I've said it somewhere before, but I'll repeat that I'm not missing the TV that I can't afford very much at all. I get enough of the so-called news on the Internet. It's just the documentaries, history programs and maybe 2 TV shows that I really miss.

Luckily, our local newspaper (actually printed and distributed from Toronto) at least has mostly valid news. I'm not sure who's running our paper now. One story in the Toronto newspapers that took up a lot of space recently was about a genuinely nice 15-year-old black student killed in a school. I'm not even sure they've caught the perpetrator.

Now when something like that happens here, that is news. And it has raised a lot of questions that people can and should discuss.

As for Smith, Hilton and their ilk, I think it all shows what people will actually "pay" for. They'll pay to see a good, even great basketball player with an attitude that really sucks and who thinks that because he's good at this one skill, he's worth all that money.

I too question the appellation of hero for so many people, even for our romance books. Yes, the "heroes" are nice guys and the gals are great too but I guess the current appellation is more convenient that "main male protagonist" and "main female protagonist". And sometimes they truly are heroic.

Actually I must admit that I've rarely watched the news anymore for several years because of the backstabbing and squabbling and... well, you get the picture...was so depressing for me.

I admit to getting an occasional "People" magazine but the last one I can actually remember was one about the widows of 9/11 who had borne children after their husbands were killed. To me, this was news too. I wondered how these women met the challenge of raising their children, and not only the babies, without the husbands most of them had undoubtedly loved.

So for these reasons and the many wars that are taking place in diverse places, which, as someone said have been totally forgotten, I'm glad that I don't listen to the news. I think that for the most part I want to know the history behind what is going on.

One National Geographic Magazine recently featured a man from Darfur who had escaped from there some 20 years ago when the dictators had come to power. He suffered horribly for years before he somehow was able to be evacuated to the U.S. Now he is an educated man with a good job and he has gone to see the refugee camps with the intention of helping some of the refugees. I didn't get a chance to read the whole article--my time at the doctor's ran out. Well, I don't think I ever heard of any problems in the Sudan at that time and I was a devotee of news. There are much more serious things going on throughout the world than the fact that Paris Hilton had to go back to jail.

11:29 PM  
Blogger Lori Foster said...

SUSAN - I can't remember the comedian's name (I'm bad with names) but he did a skit on drivers. He said he HATED those idiots that drove faster than him. And he REALLY HATED those idiots who drove slower than him.
But the ones that totally drove him INSANE were the idiots who drove the exact same speed. LOL.

I thought it was funny, as I've been in the situation of all three.
Someone zooms past.
Someone creeps along in front of you.
Someone is right beside you, going the exact same speed so you can't switch lanes.

Hilarious.
Oh, his name was George Carlin - it just came to me. LOL

Lori

5:16 AM  
Blogger Lori Foster said...

JAYNE - obviously that theory about bonding is correct: we're all on here sharing, right? ;-)

Hugs!

Lori

5:17 AM  
Blogger DFender said...

Susan,
Amazingly enough, in light of Lori's post, I just came across this quote on my George Carlin Uncensored Calendar for June 16/17 regarding television networks (think, Paris). It's long but, I think, hysterical.

IF I WERE IN CHARGE OF THE NETWORKS
The phrase "sour grapes" does not refer to jealousy or envy. Nor is it related to being a sore loser. It deals with the rationalization of failure to attain a desired end. In the original fable by Aesop, "The Fox and the Grapes", when the fox realizes he cannot leap high enough to reach the grapes, he rationalizes that even if he had gotten them, they would probably have been sour anyway. Rationalization. That's all sour grapes means. It doesn't deal with jealousy or sore losing. Yeah, I know, you say, "Well, many people are using it that way, so the meaning is changing." And I say, "Well many people are really f'ing stupid too, shall we just adopt all their standards?"

LMAO!

Deb

11:18 AM  
Blogger Stella said...

I love news.

One of the first things I do in the morning is check to see what's happened in the world over night.

Politics fascinate and horrify me at the same time. In this country we're having a marathon burlesque that's supposed to concentrate on picking presidential candidates. What a laugh. And what a bunch of losers, left, right and center.

Our world situation is horrific but we manage to spend ten times the air time on "you know who" than on Iran getting closer to a launchable nuke, Korea backing out of thier promises, and Gaza going up in flames. Incidentally, someone should tell the media that the most important thing about all those flames they like to show is that there's usually someone dying in there.

I could rant for pages. No point. Between media and celebrity we're caught in iron jaws and they are so greedy.

Stella

4:44 PM  
Blogger Lori Foster said...

Stella, we have to NOT watch the idiotic news, and only tune in to the appropriate stuff. Ratings will win.
Unfortunately, we're in a minority and Paris Hilton gets mega ratings - even if the girl sneezes.

Thus the world we live in.

Sad, but true.

Lori

5:35 AM  
Anonymous AgTigress said...

I imagine we are all speculating like anything about what Jayne said in her wine-inspired, deleted posts. I find wine conducive to writing, personally, and it is said that the great Georgette Heyer usually had a glass of g-&-t to hand while working...

On the 'bonding' issue, this is probably the only thing to be said in favour of the celebrity culture. People who work in the same profession, know the same people, have the same hobbies and interests, bond through discussing those things, but by their nature, they exclude other social groups. Within random groups, either of strangers or of people we know, but who do not have those work or hobby-related interests in common with us, we usually use subjects that 'everyone' knows about, and about which 'everyone' has an opinion, to establish and maintain conversational contact. Hence the popularity in some cultures of ritual comments about the weather - we all experience it, and most of us have opinions about it.

On the whole, I'd rather talk about the weather than about Ms. Hilton, but the principle is the same.

7:23 AM  
Blogger Jayne Ann Krentz said...

Agtigress: The Grand Heyer wrote with a G&T at hand? Hmmm....

--Jayne

8:08 AM  
Anonymous AgTigress said...

So it seems!

:-D

9:40 AM  
Blogger Stella said...

A good wine isn't at all bad drunk through a straw. It's so annoying to have to keep getting up when you're writing, so just pop a long straw in a bottle of your favorite vintage, and write away.

Stella

11:37 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger